Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264391›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2017

Benefits and Barriers of Cancer Practitioners Discussing Physical Activity with their Cancer Patients.

Justin W L Keogh, Alicia Olsen, Michael Climstein, Sally Sargeant, Lynnette Jones

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Barriers and facilitators to giving prehabilitation advice by clinical nurse specialists and advanced nurse practitioners in oncology patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Health care professionals' understanding of contraindications for physical activity advice in the setting of stem cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Exercise counselling and referral in cancer care: an international scoping survey of health care practitioners' knowledge, practices, barriers, and facilitators.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancer survivors' experiences of a community-based cancer-specific exercise programme: results of an exploratory survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Justin W L KeoghFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia. jkeogh@bond.edu.au.
Alicia OlsenFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Michael ClimsteinExercise, Health and Performance Faculty Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sally SargeantFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Lynnette JonesSchool of Physical Education, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Bond University · AUUniversity of Otago · NZUniversity of Sydney · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our aim was to synthesise the existing empirical literature and theoretical perspectives on the physical activity (PA) promotion practices and determinants of cancer clinicians and health professionals. We conducted a narrative review of theory and evidence to develop practice recommendations for improving the promotion of PA to cancer patients. Surveyed health professionals were aware of many benefits of PA for their cancer patients, although only ~40 % promoted PA to selected cancer patients. Walking was the most commonly promoted form of PA, with this promoted to assist patients control their weight and cardiovascular health risk. Barriers to promotion of PA included lack of time and knowledge of PA and behaviour change skills. Health professionals appear interested in promoting PA to their cancer patients, yet encounter several barriers. Further research is warranted to assist health professionals improve their PA promotion. An adapted reflective-impulsive model of social behaviour shows promise for assisting health professionals overcome barriers and provides an evidence-based theoretical framework for improving communication with patients. Universities, hospitals and/or health-care accreditation organisations also have important roles to play in assisting health professionals improve their promotion of PA to patients.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionMedical OncologyCounselingDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansCancerCounsellingExerciseOncologyPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID26264391
OpenAlexW1758175307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.