Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26264220›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2015

High-resolution ultrasound of peripheral nerves in systemic sclerosis: a pilot study of computer-aided quantitative assessment of nerve density.

Bianca Bignotti, Massimo Ghio, Nicoletta Panico, Giulio Tagliafico, Carlo Martinoli, Alberto Tagliafico

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bianca BignottiDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Massimo GhioDepartment of Internal Medicine IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino-IST, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Nicoletta PanicoDepartment of Medicine, Lavagna Hospital, Via Don Bobbio 25, 16033, Lavagna, Italy.
Giulio TagliaficoConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche, Via De Marini 6, 16149, Genoa, Italy.
Carlo MartinoliDepartment of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi 8, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
Alberto TagliaficoInstitute of Anatomy, Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Largo Rosanna Benzi, No. 8, 16132, Genoa, Italy. atagliafico@sirm.org.
University of Genoa · ITAzienda Unità Sanitaria Locale Della Romagna · ITIstituto di Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo quantitatively evaluate and compare nerve density in patients with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (lcSSc) and control subjects using high-resolution ultrasound (US) with a computer-aided assessment.

methodsForty patients and 40 age- and sex-matched control subjects were prospectively enrolled. Ultrasound (US) examination (17-5 MHz probe) of the median nerve at the elbow was performed bilaterally by one radiologist. A software quantified the ratio between the hypoechoic and hyperechoic areas of peripheral nerves on ultrasound. Two observers set the threshold in the images acquired, and three observers performed the digital analysis of nerve density. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U-test of patients versus control subjects and subgroup analysis of symptomatic and non-symptomatic patients. Intra and inter-observer agreement of the three observers were assessed with the kappa statistic.

resultsIn all, 160 median nerves were evaluated. According to the US, nerve density was significantly reduced in lcSSc patients compared to control subjects (mean and standard deviation: 41 ± 3 vs 56 ± 4, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that symptomatic patients (n = 15) had reduced nerve density compared to non-symptomatic (n = 25) patients (39 ± 5 vs 43 ± 4, p < 0.01). Intra-observer agreement was very good (K = 0.82). Inter-observer agreements were good: reader 1 vs reader 2: k = 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.91); reader 2 vs reader 3: k = 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.65 to 0.82); reader 3 vs reader 1: k = 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.81).

conclusionsIn lcSSc patients, nerve density was reduced, especially in the symptomatic group, compared to control subjects.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsDensitometryFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPeripheral NervesPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsScleroderma, SystemicSensitivity and SpecificityNerve densityNeuropathyPeripheral nerveSclerodermaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID26264220
OpenAlexW1170042719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.