Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263878›Full record

ArticleEmergency radiology2015

Evaluation of an initiative to reduce radiation exposure from CT to children in a non-pediatric-focused facility.

Einat Blumfield, Jonathan Zember, Mark Guelfguat, Amit Blumfield, Harold Goldman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overuse of CT and MRI in paediatric emergency departments.The British journal of radiology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Einat BlumfieldAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. einat.blumfield@nbhn.net.
Jonathan ZemberAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. jonathan.zember@gmail.com.
Mark GuelfguatAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. Mark.Guelfguat@nbhn.net.
Amit BlumfieldCornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. amitblumfield@msn.com.
Harold GoldmanAlbert Einstein College of Medicine Jacobi Medical Center, 1400 Pelham Parkway South, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA. hgoldman@aecom.yu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We would like to share our experience of reducing pediatric radiation exposure. Much of the recent literature regarding successes of reducing radiation exposure has come from dedicated children's hospitals. Nonetheless, over the past two decades, there has been a considerable increase in CT imaging of children in the USA, predominantly in non-pediatric-focused facilities where the majority of children are treated. In our institution, two general hospitals with limited pediatric services, a dedicated initiative intended to reduce children's exposure to CT radiation was started by pediatric radiologists in 2005. The initiative addressed multiple issues including eliminating multiphase studies, decreasing inappropriate scans, educating referring providers, training residents and technologists, replacing CT with ultrasound or MRI, and ensuring availability of pediatric radiologists for consultation. During the study period, the total number of CT scans decreased by 24 %. When accounting for the number of scans per visit to the emergency department (ED), the numbers of abdominal and head CT scans decreased by 37.2 and 35.2 %, respectively. For abdominal scans, the average number of phases per scan decreased from 1.70 to 1.04. Upon surveying the pediatric ED staff, it was revealed that the most influential factors on ordering of scans were daily communication with pediatric radiologists, followed by journal articles and lectures by pediatric radiologists. We concluded that a non-pediatric-focused facility can achieve dramatic reduction in CT radiation exposure to children; however, this is most effectively achieved through a dedicated, multidisciplinary process led by pediatric radiologists.

Indexed as

Radiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitals, GeneralHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNew York CityOrganizational InnovationProgram EvaluationQuality ImprovementRadiation ProtectionALARAEmergency departmentImage GentlyPediatric radiologyRadiation reductionUtilization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.