Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263805›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2015

Single incision glove port laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection.

H M N Joshi, M P Gosselink, S Adusumilli, R Hompes, C Cunningham, I Lindsey, O M Jones

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H M N JoshiOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
M P GosselinkOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
S AdusumilliOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
R HompesOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
C CunninghamOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
I LindseyOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
O M JonesOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust , UK.
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe advantages of single port surgery remain controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single incision glove port colon resections using a diathermy hook, reusable ports and standard laparoscopic straight instrumentation.

methodsBetween June 2012 and February 2014, 70 consecutive patients (30 women) underwent a colonic resection using a wound retractor and glove port. Forty patients underwent a right hemicolectomy through the umbilicus and thirty underwent attempted single port resection via an incision in the right rectus sheath (14 high anterior resection, 13 low anterior resection, 3 abdominoperineal resection).

resultsSixty-two procedures (89%) were completed without conversion to open or multiport techniques. Four procedures had to be converted and additional ports were needed in four other patients. The postoperative mortality rate was 0%. Complications occurred in six patients (9%). Two cases were R1 while the remainder were R0 with a median nodal harvest of 20 (range: 9-48). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days (range: 3-25 days) (right hemicolectomy: 5 days (range: 3-12 days), left sided resection: 6 days (range: 4-25 days). At a median follow-up of 14 months, no port site hernias were observed.

conclusionsSingle incision glove port surgery is an appropriate technique for different colorectal cancer resections and has the advantage of being less expensive than surgery with commercial single incision ports.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColectomyColorectal NeoplasmsEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopesLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesGlove portLaparoscopic surgerySingle port

Identifiers

PMID26263805
PMCPMC4474013
OpenAlexW2079755519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.