Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263547›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) Complex in Plants: Genome Wide Identification, Evolutionary Conservation and Functional Determination.

Rakesh Srivastava, Krishan Mohan Rai, Bindu Pandey, Sudhir P Singh, Samir V Sawant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. SAGA Complex Subunits inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The maizePlant direct · 2020
    Article
  10. Next Generation Winemakers: Genetic Engineering inBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rakesh SrivastavaPlant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; School of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Krishan Mohan RaiPlant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Bindu PandeyPlant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sudhir P SinghNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute (DBT), Mohali, Panjab, India.
Samir V SawantPlant Molecular Biology & Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
National Botanical Research Institute · INBanaras Hindu University · INCouncil of Scientific and Industrial Research · INNational Agri-Food Biotechnology Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recruitment of RNA polymerase II on a promoter is assisted by the assembly of basal transcriptional machinery in eukaryotes. The Spt-Ada-Gcn5-Acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex plays an important role in transcription regulation in eukaryotes. However, even in the advent of genome sequencing of various plants, SAGA complex has been poorly defined for their components and roles in plant development and physiological functions. Computational analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa genomes for SAGA complex resulted in the identification of 17 to 18 potential candidates for SAGA subunits. We have further classified the SAGA complex based on the conserved domains. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the SAGA complex proteins are evolutionary conserved between plants, yeast and mammals. Functional annotation showed that they participate not only in chromatin remodeling and gene regulation, but also in different biological processes, which could be indirect and possibly mediated via the regulation of gene expression. The in silico expression analysis of the SAGA components in Arabidopsis and O. sativa clearly indicates that its components have a distinct expression profile at different developmental stages. The co-expression analysis of the SAGA components suggests that many of these subunits co-express at different developmental stages, during hormonal interaction and in response to stress conditions. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of SAGA component genes further confirmed their expression in different plant tissues and stresses. The expression of representative salt, heat and light inducible genes were affected in mutant lines of SAGA subunits in Arabidopsis. Altogether, the present study reveals expedient evidences of involvement of the SAGA complex in plant gene regulation and stress responses.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionChromosomes, PlantCluster AnalysisConserved SequenceDatabases, Nucleic AcidEvolution, MolecularGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultiprotein ComplexesPhylogenyPlant ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesPlant ProteinsProtein SubunitsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID26263547
PMCPMC4532415
OpenAlexW1132535445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.