Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263512›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Genomic Analysis and Isolation of RNA Polymerase II Dependent Promoters from Spodoptera frugiperda.

Maren Bleckmann, Markus H-Y Fritz, Sabin Bhuju, Michael Jarek, Margitta Schürig, Robert Geffers, Vladimir Benes, Hüseyin Besir, Joop van den Heuvel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Exploring new dimensions of immune cell biology inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maren BleckmannDepartment of Structure and Function of Proteins, Research Group Recombinant Protein Expression, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Markus H-Y FritzDepartment of Protein Expression and Purification Core Facility & Genomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabin BhujuDepartment of Genome Analytics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Michael JarekDepartment of Genome Analytics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Margitta SchürigDepartment of Structure and Function of Proteins, Research Group Recombinant Protein Expression, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Robert GeffersDepartment of Genome Analytics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Vladimir BenesDepartment of Protein Expression and Purification Core Facility & Genomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, Germany.
Hüseyin BesirDepartment of Protein Expression and Purification Core Facility & Genomics Core Facility, EMBL Heidelberg, Germany.
Joop van den HeuvelDepartment of Structure and Function of Proteins, Research Group Recombinant Protein Expression, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Baculoviral Expression Vector System (BEVS) is the most commonly used method for high expression of recombinant protein in insect cells. Nevertheless, expression of some target proteins--especially those entering the secretory pathway--provides a severe challenge for the baculovirus infected insect cells, due to the reorganisation of intracellular compounds upon viral infection. Therefore, alternative strategies for recombinant protein production in insect cells like transient plasmid-based expression or stable expression cell lines are becoming more popular. However, the major bottleneck of these systems is the lack of strong endogenous polymerase II dependent promoters, as the strong baculoviral p10 and polH promoters used in BEVS are only functional in presence of the viral transcription machinery during the late phase of infection. In this work we present a draft genome and a transcriptome analysis of Sf21 cells for the identification of the first known endogenous Spodoptera frugiperda promoters. Therefore, putative promoter sequences were identified and selected because of high mRNA level or in analogy to other strong promoters in other eukaryotic organism. The chosen endogenous Sf21 promoters were compared to early viral promoters for their efficiency to trigger eGFP expression using transient plasmid based transfection in a BioLector Microfermentation system. Furthermore, promoter activity was not only shown in Sf21 cells but also in Hi5 cells. The novel endogenous Sf21 promoters were ranked according to their activity and expand the small pool of available promoters for stable insect cell line development and transient plasmid expression in insect cells. The best promoter was used to improve plasmid based transient transfection in insect cells substantially.

Indexed as

GenomicsPromoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsCell LineGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenes, ReporterGenetic VectorsHumansIntronsMolecular Sequence DataPlasmidsRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase IISpodopteraTranscriptomeRNA, MessengerRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID26263512
PMCPMC4532503
OpenAlexW1819355275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.