Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263485›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2015

Comparative biology of cell division in the fission yeast clade.

Ying Gu, Snezhana Oliferenko

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Roles of Septins in Regulating Fission Yeast Cytokinesis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. ESCRT-dependent control of membrane remodelling during cell division.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  18. Non-model model organisms.BMC biology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ying GuRandall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK.
Snezhana OliferenkoRandall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics, King's College London, London SE1 1UL, UK. Electronic address: snezhana.oliferenko@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 103741Wellcome Trust 103741/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytokinesis must be regulated in time and space in order to preserve genome integrity during cell proliferation and to allow daughter cells to adopt distinct fates and geometries during differentiation. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has been a popular model organism for understanding spatiotemporal regulation of cytokinesis in a symmetrically dividing cell. Recent work on another member of the same genus, Schisozaccharomyces japonicus, suggests that S. pombe may have evolved an unusual division site placement mechanism based on a recently duplicated anillin paralog. Here we discuss an extraordinary evolutionary plasticity of cytokinesis within the fission yeast clade and argue that the comparative cell biology approach may provide functional insights beyond those afforded by scrutinizing individual model species.

Indexed as

ActinsBiological EvolutionCell Cycle ProteinsContractile ProteinsCytokinesisFungal ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, FungalGTP-Binding ProteinsMitosisProtein KinasesSchizosaccharomycesActinsanillinCDC15 proteinCell Cycle ProteinsContractile ProteinsFungal ProteinsGTP-Binding ProteinsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID26263485
PMCPMC7100901
OpenAlexW2218026231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.