Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263439›Full record

ArticleShock (Augusta, Ga.)2015

Low-Dose Heparin Anticoagulation During Extracorporeal Life Support for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Conscious Sheep.

Nicolas J Prat, Andrew D Meyer, Thomas Langer, Robbie K Montgomery, Bijaya K Parida, Andriy I Batchinsky, Andrew P Cap

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas J Prat*French Armed Forces Institute of Biomedical Research (IRBA), Paris, France †Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas ‡Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency and Urgency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda-Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy §Coagulation and Blood Research ||Comprehensive Intensive Care Research, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR), Ft. Sam Houston, Texas.
Andrew D Meyer
Thomas Langer
Robbie K Montgomery
Bijaya K Parida
Andriy I Batchinsky
Andrew P Cap
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITService de Santé des Armées · FRThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUnited States Army Institute of Surgical Research · US

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR001118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, DOUGHERTY, DONALD M · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthKL2TR000118 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A · 2012 to 2013
$757k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver 32% of burned battlefield causalities develop trauma-induced hypoxic respiratory failure, also known as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Recently, 9 out of 10 US combat soldiers' survived life-threatening trauma-induced ARDS supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a portable form of cardiopulmonary bypass. Unfortunately, the size, incidence of coagulation complications, and the need for systematic anticoagulation for traditional ECMO devices have prevented widespread use of this lifesaving technology. Therefore, a compact, mobile, ECMO system using minimal anticoagulation may be the solution to reduce ARDS in critically ill military and civilian patients.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort laboratory investigation to evaluate the coagulation function in an ovine model of oleic acid induced ARDS supported with veno-venous ECMO. The experimental design approximated the time needed to transport from a battlefield setting to an advanced facility and compared bolus versus standard heparin anticoagulation therapy.

resultsComprehensive coagulation and hemostasis assays did not show any difference because of ECMO support over 10 h between the two groups but did show changes because of injury. Platelet count and function did decrease with support on ECMO, but there was no significant bleeding or clot formation during the entire experiment.

conclusionsA bolus heparin injection is sufficient to maintain ECMO support for up to 10 h in an ovine model of ARDS. With a reduced need for systematic anticoagulation, ECMO use for battlefield trauma could reduce significant morbidity and mortality from ventilator-induced lung injury and ARDS. Future studies will investigate the mechanisms and therapies to support patients for longer periods on ECMO without coagulation complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V--therapeutic animal experiment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticoagulantsBlood Cell CountCardiopulmonary BypassCohort StudiesCritical IllnessDisease Models, AnimalExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleFlow CytometryHemostasisHeparinHypoxiaOleic AcidPlatelet AggregationPlatelet CountAnticoagulantsHeparinOleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID26263439
PMCPMC4851223
OpenAlexW2408089509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.