Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26263186›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The Influence of Prior Learning Experience on Pollinator Choice: An Experiment Using Bumblebees on Two Wild Floral Types of Antirrhinum majus.

Coline C Jaworski, Christophe Andalo, Christine Raynaud, Valérie Simon, Christophe Thébaud, Jérôme Chave

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Coline C JaworskiCNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, UMR 5174, Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Toulouse, France.
Christophe AndaloCNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, UMR 5174, Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Toulouse, France.
Christine RaynaudUniversité de Toulouse, INP-ENSIACET, LCA (Laboratoire de Chimie Agro-industrielle), Toulouse, France; INRA, UMR 1010-CAI, Toulouse, France.
Valérie SimonUniversité de Toulouse, INP-ENSIACET, LCA (Laboratoire de Chimie Agro-industrielle), Toulouse, France; INRA, UMR 1010-CAI, Toulouse, France.
Christophe ThébaudCNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, UMR 5174, Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Toulouse, France.
Jérôme ChaveCNRS-Université Paul Sabatier, UMR 5174, Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique, Toulouse, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FRInstitut National de la Recherche Agronomique · MAInstitut National Polytechnique de Toulouse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how pollinator behavior may influence pollen transmission across floral types is a major challenge, as pollinator decision depends on a complex range of environmental cues and prior experience. Here we report an experiment using the plant Antirrhinum majus and the bumblebee Bombus terrestris to investigate how prior learning experience may affect pollinator preferences between floral types when these are presented together. We trained naive bumblebees to forage freely on flowering individuals of either A. majus pseudomajus (magenta flowers) or A. majus striatum (yellow flowers) in a flight cage. We then used a Y-maze device to expose trained bumblebees to a dual choice between the floral types. We tested the influence of training on their choice, depending on the type of plant signals available (visual signals, olfactory signals, or both). Bumblebees had no innate preference for either subspecies. Bumblebees trained on the yellow-flowered subspecies later preferred the yellow type, even when only visual or only olfactory signals were available, and their preference was not reinforced when both signal types were available. In contrast, bumblebees trained on the magenta-flowered subspecies showed no further preference between floral types and took slightly more time to make their choice. Since pollinator constancy has been observed in wild populations of A. majus with mixed floral types, we suggest that such constancy likely relies on short-term memory rather than acquired preference through long-term memory induced by prior learning.

Indexed as

AntirrhinumBeesBehavior, AnimalPollinationAnimalsFlowersLearning

Identifiers

PMID26263186
PMCPMC4532467
OpenAlexW1929186616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.