Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26262776›Full record

ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2015

Implementation and Operational Research: Decentralization Does Not Assure Optimal Delivery of PMTCT and HIV-Exposed Infant Services in a Low Prevalence Setting.

Andrew Edmonds, Lydia Feinstein, Vitus Okitolonda, Deidre Thompson, Bienvenu Kawende, Frieda Behets

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew Edmonds*Department of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; †Kinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo; and ‡School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Lydia Feinstein
Vitus Okitolonda
Deidre Thompson
Bienvenu Kawende
Frieda Behets
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Kinshasa · CD

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
POPULATION STUDIEST32HD007168 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELIZABETH A FRANKENBERG · 1985 to 2026
$13.8M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Training in Infectious Disease Epidemiology (TIDE)T32AI070114 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Brian W Pence · 2007 to 2026
$4.0M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U2G PS001179NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI50410NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI070114NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe consequences of decentralizing prevention of mother-to-child HIV transmission and HIV-exposed infant services to antenatal care (ANC)/labor and delivery (L&D) sites from dedicated HIV care and treatment (C&T) centers remain unknown, particularly in low prevalence settings.

methodsIn a cohort of mother-infant pairs, we compared delivery of routine services at ANC/L&D and C&T facilities in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo from 2010-2013, using methods accounting for competing risks (eg, death). Women could opt to receive interventions at 90 decentralized ANC/L&D sites, or 2 affiliated C&T centers. Additionally, we assessed decentralization's population-level impacts by comparing proportions of women and infants receiving interventions before (2009-2010) and after (2011-2013) decentralization.

resultsAmong newly HIV-diagnosed women (N = 1482), the 14-week cumulative incidence of receiving the package of CD4 testing and zidovudine or antiretroviral therapy was less at ANC/L&D [66%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 63% to 69%] than at C&T (88%; 95% CI: 83% to 92%) sites (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.69). Delivery of cotrimoxazole and DNA polymerase chain reaction testing to HIV-exposed infants (N = 1182) was inferior at ANC/L&D sites (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.92); the 10-month cumulative incidence of the package at ANC/L&D sites was 89% (95% CI: 82% to 93%) versus 97% (95% CI: 93% to 99%) at C&T centers. Receipt of the pregnancy (20% of 1518, to 64% of 1405) and infant (16%-31%) packages improved post decentralization.

conclusionsServices were delivered less efficiently at ANC/L&D sites than C&T centers. Although access improved with decentralization, its potential cannot be realized without sufficient and sustained support.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdolescentAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsCohort StudiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAnti-Retroviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID26262776
PMCPMC4856046
OpenAlexW1138728141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.