Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26262642›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2015

The Long Term Impact of Micronutrient Supplementation during Infancy on Cognition and Executive Function Performance in Pre-School Children.

Marisol Warthon-Medina, Pamela Qualter, Nelly Zavaleta, Stephanie Dillon, Fabiola Lazarte, Nicola M Lowe

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of NutriCHEQ in Iranian Toddlers.International journal of preventive medicine · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Dietary Supplement Use Among Chinese Primary School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hunan Province.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marisol Warthon-MedinaInternational Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK.
Pamela QualterSchool of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. PQualter@uclan.ac.uk.
Nelly ZavaletaInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Perú (IIN), Avenida La Universidad, La Molina 1885, Lima 12, Perú. nzavalet@iin.sld.pe.
Stephanie DillonInternational Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. SDillon@uclan.ac.uk.
Fabiola LazarteInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Perú (IIN), Avenida La Universidad, La Molina 1885, Lima 12, Perú. fabiolalazarte@hotmail.com.
Nicola M LoweInternational Institute of Nutritional Sciences and Applied Food Safety Studies, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK. NMLowe@uclan.ac.uk.
University of Lancashire · GBInstituto de Investigación Nutricional · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain growth and development are critically dependent on several micronutrients. During early development cellular activity may be sensitive to micronutrient deficiencies, however the evidence from human studies is equivocal. The objective of this study was to examine the long-term cognitive and social-emotional effects of multiple micronutrient supplementation compared with iron supplementation alone, administered during infancy. This study was a follow-up to an initial randomized, double-blind controlled trial (RCT) in 2010 in which 902 infants, aged 6-17 months, from Lima, Peru, were given daily supplements of either iron (Fe) or multiple micronutrients (MMN) including zinc (451 in each group). The supplementation period for both groups was six months. In 2012, a subsample of 184 children from the original cohort (now aged 36-48 months) was randomly selected to participate in a follow-up trial and was assessed for intelligence, working memory, inhibition, and executive function. The tests showed no significant differences between the supplementation groups though there were some gender differences, with girls displaying higher scores than boys across both groups on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI) Verbal IQ sentences subtest, the Day-Night cognitive test and on the Brief Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) social competency, and boys scoring higher than girls in problem behaviour. The results indicate that MMN supplementation had no long term additional effects on cognitive function compared with iron supplementation alone. The timing of supplement administration for maximum impact on a child's cognitive development requires further investigation.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDietary SupplementsChild, PreschoolCognitionDouble-Blind MethodExecutive FunctionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantIntelligenceIron, DietaryMaleMicronutrientsPeruSurveys and QuestionnairesIron, DietaryMicronutrientsZinccognitive functionironmultiple micronutrient supplementationzinc

Identifiers

PMID26262642
PMCPMC4555141
OpenAlexW2122429689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.