Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26262584›Full record

ArticleGene therapy2016

Intradermal delivery of DNA encoding HCV NS3 and perforin elicits robust cell-mediated immunity in mice and pigs.

B Grubor-Bauk, W Yu, D Wijesundara, J Gummow, T Garrod, A J Brennan, I Voskoboinik, E J Gowans

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gene therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. DNA Vaccines-How Far From Clinical Use?International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Review of DNA Vaccines Against Influenza.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B Grubor-BaukVirology Laboratory, Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Medicine, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
W YuVirology Laboratory, Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Medicine, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
D WijesundaraVirology Laboratory, Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Medicine, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
J GummowVirology Laboratory, Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Medicine, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
T GarrodVirology Laboratory, Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Medicine, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
A J BrennanKiller Cell Biology Laboratory, Cancer Immunology Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
I VoskoboinikKiller Cell Biology Laboratory, Cancer Immunology Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
E J GowansVirology Laboratory, Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide and Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Medicine, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Basil Hetzel Institute · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, no vaccine is available against hepatitis C virus (HCV), and although DNA vaccines have considerable potential, this has not been realised. Previously, the efficacy of DNA vaccines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HCV was shown to be enhanced by including the gene for a cytolytic protein, viz. perforin. In this study, we examined the mechanism of cell death by this bicistronic DNA vaccine, which encoded the HCV non-structural protein 3 (NS3) under the control of the CMV promoter and perforin is controlled by the SV40 promoter. Compared with a canonical DNA vaccine and a bicistronic DNA vaccine encoding NS3 and the proapoptotic gene NSP4, the perforin-containing vaccine elicited enhanced cell-mediated immune responses against the NS3 protein in vaccinated mice and pigs, as determined by ELISpot and intracellular cytokine staining, whereas a mouse challenge model suggested that the immunity was CD8(+) T-cell-dependent. The results of the study showed that the inclusion of perforin in the DNA vaccine altered the fate of NS3-positive cells from apoptosis to necrosis, and this resulted in more robust immune responses in mice and pigs, the latter of which represents an accepted large animal model in which to test vaccine efficacy.

Indexed as

HepacivirusImmunity, CellularAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDisease Models, AnimalDNA, ViralEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayGlycoproteinsHEK293 CellsHumansImmunizationMaleMiceDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA, ViralGlycoproteinsNS28 protein, rotavirusNS3 protein, hepatitis C virusNucleoside-TriphosphatasePerforinSerine EndopeptidasesToxins, BiologicalVaccines, DNAViral Nonstructural ProteinsViral Proteases

Identifiers

PMID26262584
OpenAlexW2165511252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.