ArticleStudies in health technology and informatics2015
A Frequency-based Strategy of Obtaining Sentences from Clinical Data Repository for Crowdsourcing.
Article in Studies in health technology and informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Data Warehousing: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Society for Clinical Data Management · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In clinical NLP, one major barrier to adopting crowdsourcing for NLP annotation is the issue of confidentiality for protected health information (PHI) in clinical narratives. In this paper, we investigated the use of a frequency-based approach to extract sentences without PHI. Our approach is based on the assumption that sentences appearing frequently tend to contain no PHI. Both manual and automatic evaluations on 500 sentences out of the 7.9 million sentences of frequencies higher than one show that no PHI can be found among them. The promising results provide potentials of releasing those sentences for obtaining sentence-level NLP annotations via crowdsourcing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26262333PMC5859924What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.