Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26261748›Full record

ArticleJournal of wrist surgery2015

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in the Treatment of Malunited Distal Radius Fractures?

Dominique J G Disseldorp, Martijn Poeze, Pascal F W Hannemann, Peter R G Brink

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of wrist surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07476404 (Re-bleeding in Giant Meningioma and Intraoperative Hydroxyethyl Starch), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07476404 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Re-bleeding in Giant Meningioma and Intraoperative Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Fluid Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChiang Mai UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsMeningioma of Brain, Meningioma SurgeryArmsexposure to Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Voluven® or Volulyte® 130/0.4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Distal radius fractures-Why do they fail?Journal of orthopaedics · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FDA-approved bone grafts and bone graft substitute devices in bone regeneration.Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Patient-specific plate for navigation and fixation of the distal radius: a case series.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dominique J G DisseldorpDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Martijn PoezeDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pascal F W HannemannDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter R G BrinkDepartment of General Surgery and Traumatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Open wedge osteotomy with bone grafting and plate fixation is the standard procedure for the correction of malunited distal radius fractures. Bone grafts are used to increase structural stability and to enhance new bone formation. However, bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidity, delayed union at bone-graft interfaces, size mismatch between graft and osteotomy defect, and additional operation time. Purpose The goal of this study was to assess bone healing and secondary fracture displacement in the treatment of malunited distal radius fractures without the use of bone grafting. Methods Between January 1993 and December 2013, 132 corrective osteotomies and plate fixations without bone grafting were performed for malunited distal radius fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Primary study outcomes were time to complete bone healing and secondary fracture displacement. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs during follow-up were compared with each other, as well as with radiographs of the uninjured side. Results All 132 osteotomies healed. In two cases (1.5%), healing took more than 4 months, but reinterventions were not necessary. No cases of secondary fracture displacement or hardware failure were observed. Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters were shown after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation. Conclusion This study shows that bone grafts are not required for bone healing and prevention of secondary fracture displacement after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of malunited distal radius fractures. Level of evidence Therapeutic, level IV, case series with no comparison group.

Indexed as

bone graftsbone healingcorrective osteotomy and plate fixationmalunited distal radius fracturessecondary fracture displacement

Identifiers

PMID26261748
PMCPMC4530180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.