ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2015
Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CT in the prediction of margin-negative resection in pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Resection Rates and Clinical Outcomes After FOLFIRINOX-Based Treatment in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Radiomic Features at CT Can Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer from Noncancerous Pancreas.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2021Trial
- Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Trial
- Conversion surgery for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis at initial diagnosis: a nationwide multicenter study.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Multicenter Validation of Foundation Model Adaptation for Automated Pancreatic Tumor Delineation on CT Scans.Cancers · 2026Article
- Radiologic-pathologic discrepancy in the tumor size assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the era of preoperative therapy.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of patients with different distant and lymph node metastasis in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- pH-Responsive Liposomes for Targeted Detection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Using MSOT.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- MDMU-Net: 3D multi-dimensional decoupled multi-scale U-Net for pancreatic cancer segmentation.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Review
- Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Identification and analysis of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Does an extensive diagnostic workup for upfront resectable pancreatic cancer result in a delay which affects survival? Results from an international multicentre study.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2023Article
- Use of individualized 3D-printed models of pancreatic cancer to improve surgeons' anatomic understanding and surgical planning.European radiology · 2023Article
- Tumour origin, diagnostic accuracy and histopathological evaluation in patients with periampullary cancer: nationwide cohort study.BJS open · 2023Article
- Machine learning was used to predict risk factors for distant metastasis of pancreatic cancer and prognosis analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Gastrointestinal malignancies in pregnancy.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Review
- Detection of pancreatic cancer with two- and three-dimensional radiomic analysis in a nationwide population-based real-world dataset.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Synchronous Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Head and Tail, a Double Trouble: A Case Report and Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly lethal malignancy which is increasing in incidence and mortality. The fourth leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., pancreatic cancer is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death by 2020. Patients with pancreatic cancer have an abysmal 5-year survival of 6%, and 90% of these patients eventually die from the disease. This is in large part due to the commonly advanced stage of disease at the time of diagnosis. Currently, the only potentially curative therapy for pancreatic carcinoma is complete surgical resection. Patients who undergo incomplete resection with residual disease have similar survival rates to those patients with metastatic disease and should be spared this relatively morbid surgery. Thus, the key to impacting prognosis is the detection of smaller and earlier stage lesions, and the key to optimal management is accurately determining which patients have potentially resectable surgery and which patients would not benefit from surgery. Cross-sectional imaging plays an essential role in both the diagnosis and appropriate staging of pancreatic carcinoma. The diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is performed with cross-sectional imaging. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is the most commonly used, best-validated imaging modality for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Modern contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been demonstrated to be equivalent to MDCT in detection and staging of pancreatic cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is very sensitive for detecting pancreatic masses; however, due to limitations in adequate overall abdominal staging, it is generally used in addition to or after MDCT. Transabdominal ultrasound and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have limited roles in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer. Preoperative imaging is used to characterize patients as having resectable disease, borderline resectable disease, locally advanced disease (unresectable) and metastatic disease (unresectable). As the definitions of borderline resectable and unresectable may vary from institution to institution and within institutions, it is essential to accurately assess and describe the factors relevant to staging including: local extent of tumor, vascular involvement, lymph node involvement and distant metastatic disease. To facilitate this, standardized reporting templates for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have been created and published. Structured reporting for pancreatic cancer has been reported to provide superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer, facilitate surgical planning, and increase surgeons' confidence about tumor resectability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.