Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26261606›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

Dysregulation of miRNA-21 and their potential as biomarkers for the diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Ying Han, Guang-Xu Xu, Huan Lu, Dan-Hua Yu, Yuan Ren, Li Wang, Xu-Hong Huang, Wen-Jing Hou, Zhen-Hong Wei, Yuan-Ping Chen and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction Enhances the Inhibitive Efficacy of miR-21 Silencing in HeLa Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ying HanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Guang-Xu XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Huan LuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Dan-Hua YuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Yuan RenObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai 200011, P. R. China ; Changzhou Maternal And Child Health Care Hospital 213003 Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Li WangChangzhou Maternal And Child Health Care Hospital 213003 Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Xu-Hong HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Wen-Jing HouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Zhen-Hong WeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Yuan-Ping ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Yun-Gui CaoShanghai Jiading Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital Shanghai 201899, P. R. China.
Rong ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fengxian Hospital, Southern Medical University Shanghai 201499, P. R. China.
Southern Medical University · CNJiading District Central Hospital · CNJingzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to characterize the miR-21 and evaluated its clinical significance.

methodsTotal RNA was extracted from 30 pairs of fresh specimens of cervical cancer and normal tissues. The expression levels of the miR-21-3p and miR-21-5p were detected by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, with U6 as the internal reference gene. We compared the expression of miR-21-3p and miR-21-5p between study group and control groups, the association between miRNA expression level and clinicopathological factors was investigated.

resultsThe expression of miR-21-3p and miR-21-5p in HPV positive cervical cancer samples was significantly upregulated compared to that in the paired normal samples (P < 0.05); A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the expression of miR-21 was associated with clinicopathological parameters, including depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis.

conclusionsMiR-21 upregulation is associated with aggressive progression and poor prognosis in cervical cancer, which suggests that miR-21 might be identified as an independent marker for predicting the clinical outcome of cervical cancer patients.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingAdultBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLymphatic MetastasisMicroRNAsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, humanbiomarkercervical cancermiRNA-21

Identifiers

PMID26261606
PMCPMC4525940
OpenAlexW1123140292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.