Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26261539›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

High miR-196a and low miR-367 cooperatively correlate with unfavorable prognosis of high-grade glioma.

Yanlei Guan, Ling Chen, Yijun Bao, Bo Qiu, Chao Pang, Run Cui, Yunjie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanlei GuanDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Ling ChenDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Yijun BaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Bo QiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Chao PangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Run CuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Yunjie WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University Shenyang, Liaoning, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of microRNAs (miRNAs) could be beneficial for the diagnosis and prognosis of glioma. Therefore, we attempted to identify and develop specific miRNAs as prognostic and predictive markers for glioma patients. We compared the expression profiles of 365 miRNAs between 4 glioblastomas (GBMs, WHO grade IV) and 4 anaplastic astrocytomas (AAs, WHO grade III) using miRNA qPCR Array. MiR-196a (P = 0.004, fold change = 289.86) and miR-367 (P = 0.044, fold change = 0.03) were identified as the most up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs in GBMs compared with AAs, respectively. We subsequently examined miR-196a and miR-367 expression levels in an independent series of 63 gliomas including 50 GBMs and 13 AAs, as well as 10 non-neoplastic brain tissues, and statistically analyzed the associations between miRNA expression and clinicopathological characteristics and survivals of these glioma patients. MiR-196a and miR-367 showed significant increased and decreased expression in high-grade gliomas relative to non-neoplastic brains, as well as in GBMs versus AAs, respectively. Additionally, high-miR-196a and low-miR-367 expression, alone or in combination, statistically correlated with aggressive clinicopathological features of gliomas. Furthermore, overall survivals of glioma patients with high-miR-196a, low-miR-367 and high-miR-196a/low-miR-367 expression tended to be shorter than the corresponding control groups (all P ≤ 0.001). Moreover, multivariate analysis indicated high-miR-196a/low-miR-367 as an independent prognostic indicator for glioma patients (P = 0.005, risk ratio = 1.8). Our results suggested that both high-miR-196a and low-miR-367 expression may be associated with aggressive progression and unfavorable clinical outcome in glioma patients. And combination of high-miR-196a and low-miR-367 expression may be a novel biomarker in identifying a poor prognosis group of high-grade glioma.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChi-Square DistributionDown-RegulationFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGliomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm GradingOdds RatioBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN196 microRNA, humanMIRN367 microRNA, humanglioblastomahigh-grade gliomamicroRNAmiR-196amiR-367prognosis

Identifiers

PMID26261539
PMCPMC4525873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.