ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Systems biology definition of the core proteome of metabolism and expression is consistent with high-throughput data.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missing Genomic Resources for the Next Generation of Environmental Risk Assessment.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
- Antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae: broad-spectrum drug target identification using subtractive genomics.Genomics & informatics · 2023Article
- Understanding and mathematical modelling of cellular resource allocation in microorganisms: a comparative synthesis.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Single cell metabolomics using mass spectrometry: Techniques and data analysis.Analytica chimica acta · 2021Review
- Three overlooked key functional classes for building up minimal synthetic cells.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Reconstructing organisms in silico: genome-scale models and their emerging applications.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2020Review
- A quantitative method for proteome reallocation using minimal regulatory interventions.Nature chemical biology · 2020Article
- Salmonella Typhi, Paratyphi A, Enteritidis and Typhimurium core proteomes reveal differentially expressed proteins linked to the cell surface and pathogenicity.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- Deciphering global gene expression and regulation strategy in Escherichia coli during carbon limitation.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Comparative proteomic analysis of four biotechnological strains Lactococcus lactis through label-free quantitative proteomics.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
- Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0.Nature protocols · 2019Article
- DynamicME: dynamic simulation and refinement of integrated models of metabolism and protein expression.BMC systems biology · 2019Article
- Modeling the multi-scale mechanisms of macromolecular resource allocation.Current opinion in microbiology · 2018Review
- EumicrobeDBLite: a lightweight genomic resource and analytic platform for draft oomycete genomes.Molecular plant pathology · 2018Article
- Proteogenomic Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Predicting Dynamic Metabolic Demands in the Photosynthetic EukaryotePlant physiology · 2018Article
- Thermosensitivity of growth is determined by chaperone-mediated proteome reallocation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- Global transcriptional regulatory network forProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- A novel proposal of a simplified bacterial gene set and the neo-construction of a general minimized metabolic network.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- solveME: fast and reliable solution of nonlinear ME models.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Finding the minimal set of gene functions needed to sustain life is of both fundamental and practical importance. Minimal gene lists have been proposed by using comparative genomics-based core proteome definitions. A definition of a core proteome that is supported by empirical data, is understood at the systems-level, and provides a basis for computing essential cell functions is lacking. Here, we use a systems biology-based genome-scale model of metabolism and expression to define a functional core proteome consisting of 356 gene products, accounting for 44% of the Escherichia coli proteome by mass based on proteomics data. This systems biology core proteome includes 212 genes not found in previous comparative genomics-based core proteome definitions, accounts for 65% of known essential genes in E. coli, and has 78% gene function overlap with minimal genomes (Buchnera aphidicola and Mycoplasma genitalium). Based on transcriptomics data across environmental and genetic backgrounds, the systems biology core proteome is significantly enriched in nondifferentially expressed genes and depleted in differentially expressed genes. Compared with the noncore, core gene expression levels are also similar across genetic backgrounds (two times higher Spearman rank correlation) and exhibit significantly more complex transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulatory features (40% more transcription start sites per gene, 22% longer 5'UTR). Thus, genome-scale systems biology approaches rigorously identify a functional core proteome needed to support growth. This framework, validated by using high-throughput datasets, facilitates a mechanistic understanding of systems-level core proteome function through in silico models; it de facto defines a paleome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.