Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26261311›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Chemical fingerprints encode mother-offspring similarity, colony membership, relatedness, and genetic quality in fur seals.

Martin A Stoffel, Barbara A Caspers, Jaume Forcada, Athina Giannakara, Markus Baier, Luke Eberhart-Phillips, Caroline Müller, Joseph I Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin A StoffelDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany; School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, United Kingdom;
Barbara A CaspersArbeitsgruppe Olfactory Communication, Department of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany; j_i_hoffman@hotmail.com barbara.caspers@uni-bielefeld.de.
Jaume ForcadaBritish Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Cambridge, CB3 OET, United Kingdom;ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2115-0150
Athina GiannakaraDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany;
Markus BaierDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Luke Eberhart-PhillipsDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany;
Caroline MüllerDepartment of Chemical Ecology, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Joseph I HoffmanDepartment of Animal Behaviour, Bielefeld University, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany; j_i_hoffman@hotmail.com barbara.caspers@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical communication underpins virtually all aspects of vertebrate social life, yet remains poorly understood because of its highly complex mechanistic basis. We therefore used chemical fingerprinting of skin swabs and genetic analysis to explore the chemical cues that may underlie mother-offspring recognition in colonially breeding Antarctic fur seals. By sampling mother-offspring pairs from two different colonies, using a variety of statistical approaches and genotyping a large panel of microsatellite loci, we show that colony membership, mother-offspring similarity, heterozygosity, and genetic relatedness are all chemically encoded. Moreover, chemical similarity between mothers and offspring reflects a combination of genetic and environmental influences, the former partly encoded by substances resembling known pheromones. Our findings reveal the diversity of information contained within chemical fingerprints and have implications for understanding mother-offspring communication, kin recognition, and mate choice.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimal CommunicationAnimalsAntarctic RegionsBayes TheoremCuesEnvironmentFur SealsGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGenetics, PopulationGenotypeGeographyMicrosatellite RepeatsPheromonesRecognition, PsychologySkinPheromoneschemical communicationGC-MSgenotypemother–offspring recognitionpinniped

Identifiers

PMID26261311
PMCPMC4568685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.