Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26261205›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

The Use of Ebola Convalescent Plasma to Treat Ebola Virus Disease in Resource-Constrained Settings: A Perspective From the Field.

Johan van Griensven, Anja De Weiggheleire, Alexandre Delamou, Peter G Smith, Tansy Edwards, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Elhadj Ibrahima Bah, Robert Colebunders, Isola Herve, Catherine Lazaygues and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04372979 (Evaluation Of Efficacy Of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma In The Early Care Of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized Outside Intensive Care Units.), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04372979 phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation Of Efficacy Of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma In The Early Care Of COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized Outside Intensive Care Units.

TypeinterventionalSponsorDirection Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesRan2020 to 2021Enrolled18ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTransfusion of SARS-CoV-2 Convalescent Plasma., Transfusion of standard Plasma.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Recent Advances in Therapeutic Approaches Against Ebola Virus Infection.Recent advances in anti-infective drug discovery · 2024
    Review
  10. Global Health Perspectives on Race in Research: Neocolonial Extraction and Local Marginalization.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Lung Regeneration.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Johan van GriensvenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Anja De WeiggheleireInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alexandre DelamouCentre National de Formation et Recherche en Santé Rurale de Maferinyah, Forecariah, Guinea.
Peter G SmithLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Tansy EdwardsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Philippe VandekerckhoveBelgian Red Cross, Flanders.
Elhadj Ibrahima BahMédecins Sans Frontières, Conakry, Guinea.
Robert ColebundersInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Isola HerveEtablissement Français du Sang.
Catherine LazayguesEtablissement Français du Sang.
Nyankoye HabaNational Blood Transfusion Center, Conakry, Guinea.
Lutgarde LynenInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K012126/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical evaluation of convalescent plasma (CP) for the treatment of Ebola virus disease (EVD) in the current outbreak, predominantly affecting Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia, was prioritized by the World Health Organization in September 2014. In each of these countries, nonrandomized comparative clinical trials were initiated. The Ebola-Tx trial in Conakry, Guinea, enrolled 102 patients by 7 July 2015; no severe adverse reactions were noted. The Ebola-CP trial in Sierra Leone and the EVD001 trial in Liberia have included few patients. Although no efficacy data are available yet, current field experience supports the safety, acceptability, and feasibility of CP as EVD treatment. Longer-term follow-up as well as data from nontrial settings and evidence on the scalability of the intervention are required. CP sourced from within the outbreak is the most readily available source of anti-EVD antibodies. Until the advent of effective antivirals or monoclonal antibodies, CP merits further evaluation.

Indexed as

Immunization, PassiveAnimalsAntibodies, ViralDisease Models, AnimalEbolavirusGuineaHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMacaca mulattaAntibodies, Viralclinical trialconvalescent plasmaEbolaGuineatherapy

Identifiers

PMID26261205
PMCPMC4678103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.