ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016
Clinical findings of conservative cases with a coronally oriented vertical fracture of the posterior region of the C2 vertebral body.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Conservative treatment of trauma-associated fractures of the cervical spine with orthoses-A review].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Proposal of New Radiological Classification and Treatment Strategy for Transverse Fractures of the C2 Axis Body.Orthopaedic surgery · 2021Article
- Anterior management of C2 fractures using miniplate fixation: outcome, function and quality of life in a case series of 15 patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis report describes the characteristics of conservative cases with a coronally oriented vertical fracture of the posterior region of the C2 vertebral body.
methodsEight consecutive patients with a coronally oriented vertical fracture of the posterior region of the axis body who received conservative treatment were retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were male. The average patient age at injury was 71.4 years. The medical records of the patients were reviewed, and we identified the fractures associated with the cervical spine, other associated spinal fractures and the details of conservative treatment.
resultsSix patients had associated cervical spinal fractures, such as Jefferson fractures in four cases, spinous process fractures of the lower cervical spine in two cases, a teardrop fracture in one case and a unilateral spinous process fracture of C2 in one case. Two patients had associated spinal fractures in the thoracic spine. All the patients acquire solid bony fusion, including fusion of the associated cervical spinal fractures.
conclusionsThe patients with a coronally oriented vertical fracture of the posterior region of the C2 vertebral body consisted were all elderly males in our study. Six of the eight patients demonstrated associated cervical spinal fractures; however, all patients acquired solid bony union, including fusion of the associated cervical spinal fractures. We suggest that a Philadelphia collar may be sufficient for conservatively treating coronally oriented vertical C2 body fractures, including associated cervical spinal fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.