Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26260528›Full record

ReviewCancer research2015

Inferring the Origin of Metastases from Cancer Phylogenies.

Woo Suk Hong, Max Shpak, Jeffrey P Townsend

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Computationally reconstructing the evolution of cancer progression risk.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in Molecular Evolutionary Medicine.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Spatiotemporal Evolution of Lymph Node Spread in Early Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Neutral Theory and the Somatic Evolution of Cancer.Molecular biology and evolution · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Woo Suk HongYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Max ShpakNeuroTexas Institute, St. David's Medical Center, Austin, Texas. Center for Systems and Synthetic Biology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas. Fresh Pond Research Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. shpak.max@gmail.com.
Jeffrey P TownsendDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Integrated genomic analysis of racial disparities in endometrial cancerU01CA176067 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SANTIN, ALESSANDRO D · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 1U01CA176067-01A1NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining the evolutionary history of metastases is a key problem in cancer biology. Several recent studies have presented inferences regarding the origin of metastases based on phylogenies of cancer lineages. Many of these studies have concluded that the observed monophyly of metastatic subclones favored metastasis-to-metastasis spread ("a metastatic cascade" rather than parallel metastases from the primary tumor). In this article, we argue that identifying a monophyletic clade of metastatic subclones does not provide sufficient evidence to unequivocally establish a history of metastatic cascades. In the absence of a complete phylogeny of the subclones within the primary tumor, a scenario of parallel metastatic events from the primary tumor is an equally plausible interpretation. Future phylogenetic studies on the origin of metastases should obtain a complete phylogeny of subclones within the primary tumor. This complete phylogeny may be obtainable by ultra-deep sequencing and phasing of large sections or by targeted sequencing of many small, spatially heterogeneous sections, followed by phylogenetic reconstruction using well-established molecular evolutionary models. In addition to resolving the evolutionary history of metastases, a complete phylogeny of subclones within the primary tumor facilitates the identification of driver mutations by application of phylogeny-based tests of natural selection.

Indexed as

Cell LineageCell MovementClone CellsDNA, NeoplasmForecastingHumansMutationNeoplasm MetastasisSingle-Cell AnalysisDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID26260528
PMCPMC4833389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.