SynthesisMaternal & child nutrition2016
Periconceptional folic acid fortification for the risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.
Synthesis in Maternal & child nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating agreement between individual nutrition randomised controlled trials and cohort studies - a meta-epidemiological study.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Association Between Folate and Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.Frontiers in public health · 2020Pooled it
- Periconceptional folic acid fortification for the risk of gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Maternal & child nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- One-carbon metabolism and cardiovascular disease: Molecular mechanisms, genetic influences, and epigenetic regulation.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- A Review of Dietary and Lifestyle Management of Pre-Eclampsia and Postpartum Eclampsia.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2025Review
- Evaluating agreement between evidence from randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition: a meta-research replication study.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Before Is Better: Innovative Multidisciplinary Preconception Care in Different Clinical Contexts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Dietary factors that affect the risk of pre-eclampsia.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Published literatures report controversial results about the association of folic acid-containing multivitamins with gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. A comprehensive search was performed to identify related prospective studies to assess the effect of folic acid fortification on gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia. The Q test and I(2) statistic were used to examine between-study heterogeneity. Fixed or random effects models were selected based on study heterogeneity. A funnel plot and modified Egger linear regression test were used to estimate publication bias. Eleven studies conformed to the criteria. Pooled results indicated that folic acid fortification alone was not associated with the occurrence of gestational hypertension [relative risk (RR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98-1.09, P = 0.267] and pre-eclampsia (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.90-1.08, P = 0.738). However, supplementation of multivitamins containing folic acid could prevent gestational hypertension (RR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.76, P < 0.001) and pre-eclampsia (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.48-0.84, P = 0.001). The difference between folic acid fortification alone and multivitamins containing folic acid was significant. This meta-analysis suggests that periconceptional multivitamin supplementation with appropriate dose, not folic acid alone, is an appropriate recommendation for pregnant women. The effect should be further confirmed by conducting large-scale randomised controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.