Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26260369›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2015

Optimizing early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection at endoscopy.

Andrew M Veitch, Noriya Uedo, Kenshi Yao, James E East

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The role of artificial intelligence in the endoscopic diagnosis of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. The effect of using simethicone with or without N-acetylcysteine before gastroscopy: A meta-analysis and systemic review.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew M VeitchDepartment of Gastroenterology, New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, UK.
Noriya UedoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka Medical Centre for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 3-3, Nakamichi 1-chome, Higashinari-ku, Osaka 537-8511, Japan.
Kenshi YaoDepartment of Endoscopy, Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital, 1-1-1 Zokumyoin Chikushino-city 818-8502 Fukuoka, Japan.
James E EastTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Fukuoka University · JPJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNew Cross Hospital · GBOsaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival rates for upper gastrointestinal cancers are poor and oesophageal cancer incidence is increasing. Upper gastrointestinal cancer is also often missed during examinations; a predicament that has not yet been sufficiently addressed. Improvements in the detection of premalignant lesions, early oesophageal and gastric cancers will enable organ-preserving endoscopic therapy, potentially reducing the number of advanced upper gastrointestinal cancers and resulting in improved prognosis. Japan is a world leader in high-quality diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and the clinical routine in this country differs substantially from Western practice. In this Perspectives article, we review lessons learnt from Japanese gastroscopy technique, training and screening for risk stratification. We suggest a key performance indicator for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with a minimum total procedure time of 8 min, and examine how quality assurance concepts in bowel cancer screening in the UK could be applied to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and improve clinical practice.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, Digestive SystemUpper Gastrointestinal TractAlgorithmsEarly Detection of CancerGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26260369
OpenAlexW2172422824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.