Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26260261›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2015

Augmented genetic decoding: global, local and temporal alterations of decoding processes and codon meaning.

Pavel V Baranov, John F Atkins, Martina M Yordanova

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A data-driven estimation of the ribosome drop-off rate inNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. StORF-Reporter: finding genes between genes.Nucleic acids research · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Nontriplet feature of genetic code inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RNA biology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pavel V BaranovSchool of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Ireland.
John F Atkins1] School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Ireland. [2] Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, 15 N 2030 E Rm. 7410, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-5330, USA.
Martina M YordanovaSchool of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Ireland.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 094423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The non-universality of the genetic code is now widely appreciated. Codes differ between organisms, and certain genes are known to alter the decoding rules in a site-specific manner. Recently discovered examples of decoding plasticity are particularly spectacular. These examples include organisms and organelles with disruptions of triplet continuity during the translation of many genes, viruses that alter the entire genetic code of their hosts and organisms that adjust their genetic code in response to changing environments. In this Review, we outline various modes of alternative genetic decoding and expand existing terminology to accommodate recently discovered manifestations of this seemingly sophisticated phenomenon.

Indexed as

AnimalsCodonHumansProtein BiosynthesisVirusesCodon

Identifiers

PMID26260261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.