Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259967›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2015

Long-term ischaemic and bleeding outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly.

Bimmer E P M Claessen, Wouter J Kikkert, Loes P Hoebers, Hassina Bahadurzada, Marije M Vis, Jan Baan, Karel T Koch, Robbert J de Winter, Jan G P Tijssen, Jan J Piek and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bimmer E P M ClaessenDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands. b.e.claessen@amc.uva.nl.
Wouter J KikkertDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Loes P HoebersDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Hassina BahadurzadaDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Marije M VisDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Jan BaanDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Karel T KochDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Robbert J de WinterDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Jan G P TijssenDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
Jan J PiekDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.
José P S HenriquesDepartment of Cardiology, B2-115, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, Amsterdam, AZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe population is ageing rapidly and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 80 years undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is rising, but clinical trials have primarily been performed in younger patients.

methodsPatients undergoing primary PCI between 2003 and 2008 were subdivided into 3 groups: < 60, 60-79, and ≥ 80 years. Endpoints at 3-year follow-up included all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (reMI), stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularisation (TLR), bleeding (BARC bleeding ≥ 3), stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiac mortality, reMI, stroke and TLR).

results2002 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were included, 885 (44.2 %) aged < 60, 921 (46.0 %) 60-79, and 196 (9.7 %) ≥ 80 years. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, malignant disease, anaemia, and chronic kidney disease were more prevalent in patients ≥ 80 years. The incidence of both ischaemic and bleeding events strongly increased with age. Age ≥ 80 years was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.56, 95 % CI1.69-3.87, p < 0.001), a borderline non-significant predictor of overall bleeding (HR 1.38, 95 %CI 0.95-2.00, p = 0.088), and a significant predictor of non-access site bleeding (HR 2.26, 95 %CI 1.46-3.51, p < 0.001).

conclusionPatients ≥ 80 years experienced high rates of ischaemic and bleeding complications; especially in this high-risk patient group individualised therapy is needed to optimise clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarctionElderlyPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionStent

Identifiers

PMID26259967
PMCPMC4580666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.