Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259906›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2015

Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque.

Bryan N Brown, Deepa Mani, Alexis L Nolfi, Rui Liang, Steven D Abramowitch, Pamela A Moalli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan N BrownDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Deepa ManiMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Alexis L NolfiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Rui LiangDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Steven D AbramowitchDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Pamela A MoalliDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: pmoalli@mail.magee.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USMagee-Womens Research Institute · US

Funding

Building Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043441 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI SADOVSKY, YOEL · 2002 to 2023
$10.1M
Comprehensive Evaluation of Prolapse Meshes by an Interdisciplinary Research TeamR01HD061811 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
IMPACT OF MENOPAUSE ON VAGINAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE SUPPORTR01HD045590 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
Macrophage Phenotype as a Determinant of Outcome in Pelvic Organ Prolapse RepairR21GM107882 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BROWN, BRYAN NICKLAUS · 2013 to 2014
$387k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043441NICHD NIH HHS K12HD043441NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045590NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061811NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM107882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to determine the predominant cell type (macrophage, T lymphocyte, B lymphocyte, mast cell) within the area of implantation of the prototypical polypropylene mesh, Gynemesh PS (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ); and to determine the phenotypic profile (M1 proinflammatory, M2 antiinflammatory) of the macrophage response to 3 different polypropylene meshes: Gynemesh PS (Ethicon), and 2 lower-weight, higher-porosity meshes, UltraPro (Ethicon) and Restorelle (Coloplast, Humblebaek, Denmark). STUDY

designSacrocolpopexy was performed following hysterectomy in rhesus macaques. Sham-operated animals served as controls. At 12 weeks postsurgery, the vagina-mesh complex was excised and the host inflammatory response was evaluated. Hematoxylin and eosin was used to perform routine histomorphologic evaluation. Identification of leukocyte (CD45(+)) subsets was performed by immunolabeling for CD68 (macrophage), CD3 (T lymphocyte), CD20 (B lymphocyte), and CD117 (mast cell). M1 and M2 macrophage subsets were identified using immunolabeling (CD86(+) and CD206(+), respectively), and further evaluation was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for 2 M1 (tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin [IL]-12) and 2 M2 (IL-4 and IL-10) cytokines.

resultsHistomorphologic evaluation showed a dense cellular response surrounding each mesh fiber. CD45(+) leukocytes accounted for 21.4 ± 5.4% of total cells within the perimesh area captured in a ×20 field, with macrophages as the predominant leukocyte subset (10.5 ± 3.9% of total cells) followed by T lymphocytes (7.3 ± 1.7%), B lymphocytes (3.0 ± 1.2%), and mast cells (0.2 ± 0.2%). The response was observed to be more diffuse with increasing distance from the fiber surface. Few leukocytes of any type were observed in sham-operated animals. Immunolabeling revealed polarization of the macrophage response toward the M1 phenotype in all mesh groups. However, the ratio of M2:M1 macrophages was increased in the fiber area in UltraPro (P = .033) and Restorelle (P = .016) compared to Gynemesh PS. In addition, a shift toward increased expression of the antiinflammatory cytokine IL-10 was observed in Restorelle as compared to Gynemesh PS (P = .011).

conclusionThe host response to mesh consists predominantly of activated, proinflammatory M1 macrophages at 12 weeks postsurgery. However, this response is attenuated with implantation of lighter-weight, higher-porosity mesh. While additional work is required to establish causal relationships, these results suggest a link among the host inflammatory response, mesh textile properties, and clinical outcomes in the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAnimalsB-LymphocytesImmunohistochemistryInflammationMacaca mulattaMacrophagesMast CellsPelvic Organ ProlapsePolypropylenesT-LymphocytesPolypropylenescytokinesinflammatory responsemacrophage phenotypepolypropylene meshrhesus macaque

Identifiers

PMID26259906
PMCPMC4631685
OpenAlexW1904280223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.