Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259854›Full record

ReviewClinical neuroradiology2015

Intraoperative MR Imaging in Neurosurgery.

S Bisdas, C Roder, U Ernemann, M S Tatagiba

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical neuroradiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The impact of intraoperative magnetic resonance in routine pediatric neurosurgical practice-a 6-year appraisal.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BisdasDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. sotirios.bisdas@uni-tuebingen.de.
C RoderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
U ErnemannDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
M S TatagibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009106/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) has dramatically expanded and nowadays presents state-of-the-art technique for image-guided neurosurgery, facilitating critical precision and effective surgical treatment of various brain pathologies. Imaging hardware providing basic imaging sequences as well as advanced MRI can be seamlessly integrated into routine surgical environments, which continuously leads to emerging indications for iMRI-assisted surgery. Besides the obvious intraoperative diagnostic yield, the initial clinical benefits have to be confirmed by future-controlled long-term studies.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesHumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingMonitoring, IntraoperativeNeurosurgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedBrain tumorsDeep brain stimulationEpilepsyIntraoperative MRISkull base

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.