Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259845›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2016

Pathway analysis for RNA-Seq data using a score-based approach.

Yi-Hui Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yi-Hui ZhouBioinformatics Research Center, Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, U.S.A.

Funding

Permutation Approximations for Next Generation AssociationR21HG007840 · NHGRI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ZHOU, YIHUI · 2015 to 2016
$417k
NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG007840NHGRI NIH HHS R21HG007840
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of pathway/gene-set approaches have been proposed to provide evidence of higher-level biological phenomena in the association of expression with experimental condition or clinical outcome. Among these approaches, it has been repeatedly shown that resampling methods are far preferable to approaches that implicitly assume independence of genes. However, few approaches have been optimized for the specific characteristics of RNA-Seq transcription data, in which mapped tags produce discrete counts with varying library sizes, and with potential outliers or skewness patterns that violate parametric assumptions. We describe transformations to RNA-Seq data to improve power for linear associations with outcome and flexibly handle normalization factors. Using these transformations or alternate transformations, we apply recently developed null approximations to quadratic form statistics for both self-contained and competitive pathway testing. The approach provides a convenient integrated platform for RNA-Seq pathway testing. We demonstrate that the approach provides appropriate type I error control without actual permutation and is powerful under many settings in comparison to competing approaches. Pathway analysis of data from a study of F344 vs. HIV1Tg rats, and of sex differences in lymphoblastoid cell lines from humans, strongly supports the biological interpretability of the findings.

Indexed as

Databases, Nucleic AcidAlgorithmsAnimalsData Interpretation, StatisticalData MiningFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMaleProtein Interaction MappingRatsSequence Analysis, RNASex FactorsSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsLinear modelPathway analysisRNA-seqStatistical genetics

Identifiers

PMID26259845
PMCPMC4992401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.