ArticleBiometrics2016
Pathway analysis for RNA-Seq data using a score-based approach.
Article in Biometrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organophosphate Flame Retardants Disrupt Autism-Relevant Gene Networks Across Development: A Cross-Species Multi-Omics Study.Environmental research · 2025Article
- Statistical Inference for High-Dimensional Pathway Analysis with Multiple Responses.Computational statistics & data analysis · 2022Article
- Accounting for extra-binomial variability with differentially expressed genetic pathway data: a collaborative bioinformatic study.Stat (International Statistical Institute)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of pathway/gene-set approaches have been proposed to provide evidence of higher-level biological phenomena in the association of expression with experimental condition or clinical outcome. Among these approaches, it has been repeatedly shown that resampling methods are far preferable to approaches that implicitly assume independence of genes. However, few approaches have been optimized for the specific characteristics of RNA-Seq transcription data, in which mapped tags produce discrete counts with varying library sizes, and with potential outliers or skewness patterns that violate parametric assumptions. We describe transformations to RNA-Seq data to improve power for linear associations with outcome and flexibly handle normalization factors. Using these transformations or alternate transformations, we apply recently developed null approximations to quadratic form statistics for both self-contained and competitive pathway testing. The approach provides a convenient integrated platform for RNA-Seq pathway testing. We demonstrate that the approach provides appropriate type I error control without actual permutation and is powerful under many settings in comparison to competing approaches. Pathway analysis of data from a study of F344 vs. HIV1Tg rats, and of sex differences in lymphoblastoid cell lines from humans, strongly supports the biological interpretability of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.