Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259842›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2015

New Highly Active Antiretroviral drugs and generic drugs for the treatment of HIV infection: a budget impact analysis on the Italian National Health Service (Lombardy Region, Northern Italy).

Umberto Restelli, Francesca Scolari, Paolo Bonfanti, Davide Croce, Giuliano Rizzardini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prescribing Behavior of General Practitioners for Generic Drugs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Desimplification of Single Tablet Antiretroviral (ART) Regimens-A Practical Cost-Savings Strategy?Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Umberto RestelliCentre for Research on Organisation, Innovation and Leadership in Healthcare (CROILS), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. urestelli@gmail.com.
Francesca ScolariCentre for Research on Organisation, Innovation and Leadership in Healthcare (CROILS), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. francesca.scolari2@gmail.com.
Paolo BonfantiDepartment of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, A. Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy. pa.bonfanti@ospedale.lecco.it.
Davide CroceCentre for Research on Organisation, Innovation and Leadership in Healthcare (CROILS), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. d.croce@tiscali.it.
Giuliano RizzardiniFirst and Second Divisions of Infectious Diseases, "Luigi Sacco" Hospital, Milan, Italy. rizzardini.giuliano@hsacco.it.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZAAlessandro Manzoni Hospital · ITIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the healthcare sector, it is crucial to identify sustainable strategies in order to allow the introduction and use of innovative technologies. Now, and over the next few years, the expiry of patents for different antiretroviral drugs offers an opportunity to increase the efficiency of resources allocation. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact, on the budget of the Italian National Healthcare Service, of generic antiretroviral drugs and of new antiretroviral drugs entering the market from 2015 to 2019.

methodsA budget impact model was developed in order to forecast the rate of use of ARTs, based on trends observed within the Lombardy Region (Italy), on clinical experts' opinion, and the consequent impact on the Italian NHS budget in a five year time horizon. Different scenarios were developed, considering the sole introduction of generic drugs, of new drugs, and their cumulative effects. A multivariate sensitivity analysis was also performed.

resultsThe cumulative use of generic drugs and new drugs would lead to annual savings of 4.6 million € (-0.6 %) in 2015; 16.9 million € (-2.1 %) in 2016; 19.4 million € (-2.4 %) in 2017; 51.1 million € (-6.1 %) in 2018 and -110.3 million € (-12.8 %) in 2019. The impact of new drugs in percentage terms is +2.0 % in 2015, +3.4 % in 2016, +3.9 % in 2017, +5.7 % in 2018 and +7.7 % in 2019. The impact of generic drugs would lead to savings of 4.9 million € in 2015, 18.6 million € in 2016, 22.8 million € in 2017, 76.5 million € in 2018 and 187.4 million € in 2019. The sensitivity analysis showed annual mean savings for the Italian NHS ranging from 12.6 million €, -1.5 % compared to the base case scenario (decreasing all the rates of transition used in the simulation, and increasing the cost of generic drugs) to 76.0 million €, -9.1 % (increasing all the rates of transition used in the simulation, and decreasing the cost of generic and new drugs).

conclusionsThe use of antiretroviral generic drugs may lead to savings that would compensate the expenditure increase due to new, innovative drugs available on the market.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsDrugs, GenericHIV InfectionsHumansItalyModels, EconomicNational Health ProgramsResource AllocationDrugs, Generic

Identifiers

PMID26259842
PMCPMC4531431
OpenAlexW2130710752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.