Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259552›Full record

Observational studyArthritis care & research2014

Reliability of Assessing Hand Osteoarthritis on Digital Photographs and Associations With Radiographic and Clinical Findings.

Michelle Marshall, Helgi Jonsson, Gudrun P Helgadottir, Elaine Nicholls, Danielle van der Windt, Helen Myers, Krysia Dziedzic

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Arthritis care & research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michelle MarshallArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Helgi JonssonLandspitalinn University Hospital and University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Gudrun P HelgadottirUniversity of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Elaine NichollsArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Danielle van der WindtArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Helen MyersArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Krysia DziedzicArthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Primary Care Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Keele University · GBVersus Arthritis · GBNational University Hospital of Iceland · ISUniversity of Iceland · IS

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18174Medical Research Council G0501798Medical Research Council G9900220Versus Arthritis 18174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the reliability and construct validity of an atlas for grading hand osteoarthritis (OA) on photographs in a separate younger community-dwelling population than the development cohort.

methodsParticipants were community-dwelling adults (ages ≥50 years) in North Staffordshire, UK with hand pain or hand problems in the last year who attended a research clinic. High-quality photographs were taken in a standardized position. A photographic atlas was used to score hand joints (second and third distal interphalangeal [DIP], second and third proximal interphalangeal [PIP], and first carpometacarpal [CMC] joints) and joint groups (DIP, PIP, and CMC joints) for OA on a 0-3 scale. Hand radiographs were graded for OA using the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system. Clinical features (nodes, bony enlargement, and deformity) were determined by physical examination. Associations of photographic hand OA grades with radiographic OA and clinical features were determined to assess construct validity.

resultsIn total, 558 participants (mean age 64 years, 62% women) were included in the analyses. Reliability for scoring OA on the photographs was good (mean intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.77 and mean interrater ICC 0.71). At the joint level, photographic hand OA grade was positively associated with radiographic OA grade (Spearman's ρ = 0.19-0.57, P < 0.001) and the number of clinical features (Spearman's ρ = 0.36-0.59, P < 0.001). At the person level, individuals with higher global photographic OA scores had higher summed K/L scores and higher percentages meeting the American College of Rheumatology clinical hand OA criteria.

conclusionThis photographic scoring system was reliable and a good indicator of hand OA in a separate younger community-dwelling population than the development cohort. This method of data collection offers researchers a feasible alternative to physical examination and radiography.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleHand JointsHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationOsteoarthritisPhotographyPhysical ExaminationPredictive Value of TestsPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID26259552
PMCPMC4153954
OpenAlexW1843233424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.