Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259530›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016

Parents' Experience with Pediatric Microarray: Transferrable Lessons in the Era of Genomic Counseling.

R Z Hayeems, R Babul-Hirji, N Hoang, R Weksberg, C Shuman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic Review: The Psychosocial Impacts of Autism-Related Genetic Testing.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for a Child's Autism on Parental Perceptions.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical validity assessment of genes frequently tested on intellectual disability/autism sequencing panels.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing.Patient education and counseling · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Parental experiences of ultrarapid genomic testing for their critically unwell infants and children.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Z HayeemsProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. robin.hayeems@sickkids.ca.
R Babul-HirjiDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
N HoangDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
R WeksbergDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
C ShumanDivision of Clinical and Metabolic Genetics, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genome-based microarray and sequencing technologies hold tremendous promise for understanding, better-managing and/or preventing disease and disease-related risk. Chromosome microarray technology (array based comparative genomic hybridization [aCGH]) is widely utilized in pediatric care to inform diagnostic etiology and medical management. Less clear is how parents experience and perceive the value of this technology. This study explored parents' experiences with aCGH in the pediatric setting, focusing on how they make meaning of various types of test results. We conducted in-person or telephone-based semi-structured interviews with parents of 21 children who underwent aCGH testing in 2010. Transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically according to the principles of interpretive description. We learned that parents expect genomic tests to be of personal use; their experiences with aCGH results characterize this use as intrinsic in the test's ability to provide a much sought-after answer for their child's condition, and instrumental in its ability to guide care, access to services, and family planning. In addition, parents experience uncertainty regardless of whether aCGH results are of pathogenic, uncertain, or benign significance; this triggers frustration, fear, and hope. Findings reported herein better characterize the notion of personal utility and highlight the pervasive nature of uncertainty in the context of genomic testing. Empiric research that links pre-test counseling content and psychosocial outcomes is warranted to optimize patient care.

Indexed as

Comparative Genomic HybridizationConsumer BehaviorOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAdolescentAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChild, PreschoolCongenital AbnormalitiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMicroarrayParental experiencePersonal utilityQualitativeUncertainty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.