Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26259237›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Inverse expression of somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of different malignancy.

Daniel Kaemmerer, Tina Träger, Maike Hoffmeister, Bence Sipos, Merten Hommann, Jörg Sänger, Stefan Schulz, Amelie Lupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel KaemmererDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Tina TrägerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Maike HoffmeisterInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Bence SiposInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Germany.
Merten HommannDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
Jörg SängerInstitute of Pathology and Cytology, Bad Berka, Germany.
Stefan SchulzDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
Amelie LuppDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSomatostatin receptors (SSTR) are widely distributed in well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and serve as primary targets for diagnostics and treatment. An overexpression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, in contrast, is considered to be present mainly in highly proliferative and advanced tumors. Comparative data are still lacking, however, for neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC).

methodsSSTR subtype (1, 2A, 3, 5) and CXCR4 expression was evaluated in G1 (n = 31), G2 (n = 47), and low (G3a; Ki-67: 21-49%; n = 21) and highly proliferative (G3b; Ki-67: >50%, n = 22) G3 (total n = 43) gastroenteropancreatic NEN samples by performing immunohistochemistry with monoclonal rabbit anti-human anti-SSTR and anti-CXCR4 antibodies, respectively, and was correlated with clinical data.

resultsBoth CXCR4 and SSTR were widely expressed in all tumors investigated. CXCR4 expression differed significantly between the G1 and G3 specimens and within the G3 group (G3a to G3b), and was positively correlated with Ki-67 expression. SSTR2A, in contrast, exhibited an inverse association with Ki-67. SSTR2A was highly expressed in G1 and G2 tumors, but was significantly less abundant in G3 carcinomas. Additionally, SSTR1 expression was higher in G3a than in G3b tumors.

conclusionWe observed an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2A expression with increasing malignancy. Interestingly, 23% of the G3 specimens had strong SSTR2A expression. Because CXCR4 was strongly expressed in highly proliferative G3 carcinomas, it is an interesting new target and needs to be validated in larger studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell ProliferationFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsCXCR4 protein, humanKi-67 AntigenReceptors, CXCR4Receptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinsomatostatin receptor 2chemokine receptorCXCR4neuroendocrine carcinomaneuroendocrine tumorsomatostatin receptor

Identifiers

PMID26259237
PMCPMC4695009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.