Precision Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Promise and Challenges.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. A New Comprehensive Colorectal Cancer Risk Prediction Model Incorporating Family History, Personal Characteristics, and Environmental Factors.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
   Article
2. Effectiveness of a mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach: a Medicare Advantage pilot study.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2020
   Article
3. Cancer prevention and screening: the next step in the era of precision medicine.NPJ precision oncology · 2019
   Review
4. Evaluation of a population-based approach to familial colorectal cancer.Clinical genetics · 2017
   Article
5. Colorectal Cancer Health Disparities and the Role of US Law and Health Policy.Gastroenterology · 2016
   Article
6. Human Blood Autoantibodies in the Detection of Colorectal Cancer.PloS one · 2016
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Derivation and Validation of a Scoring System to Stratify Risk for Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.2015

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as