Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26258868›Full record

SynthesisCancer2015

Religion, spirituality, and physical health in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

Heather S L Jim, James E Pustejovsky, Crystal L Park, Suzanne C Danhauer, Allen C Sherman, George Fitchett, Thomas V Merluzzi, Alexis R Munoz, Login George, Mallory A Snyder and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
27.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 364 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Examining the effect of peer helping in a coping skills intervention: a randomized controlled trial for advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients and their family caregivers.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Heather S L JimDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
James E PustejovskyDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Crystal L ParkDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Suzanne C DanhauerDepartment of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
Allen C ShermanBehavioral Medicine Division, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
George FitchettDepartment of Religion, Health, and Human Values, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Thomas V MerluzziDepartment of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Alexis R MunozDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Login GeorgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.
Mallory A SnyderDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
John M SalsmanDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USRush University Medical Center · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Notre Dame · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Genetic Predictors of Cognitive Function, Depression and Fatigue in CancerK07CA138499 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI JIM, HEATHER S.L. · 2009 to 2013
$713k
Assessment, Development and Application of Positive Psychology Science for CancerK07CA158008 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SALSMAN, JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$668k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA138499NCI NIH HHS K07CA138499NCI NIH HHS K07 CA158008NCI NIH HHS K07CA158008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although religion/spirituality (R/S) is important in its own right for many cancer patients, a large body of research has examined whether R/S is also associated with better physical health outcomes. This literature has been characterized by heterogeneity in sample composition, measures of R/S, and measures of physical health. In an effort to synthesize previous findings, a meta-analysis of the relation between R/S and patient-reported physical health in cancer patients was performed. A search of PubMed, PsycINFO, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Cochrane Library yielded 2073 abstracts, which were independently evaluated by pairs of raters. The meta-analysis was conducted for 497 effect sizes from 101 unique samples encompassing more than 32,000 adult cancer patients. R/S measures were categorized into affective, behavioral, cognitive, and 'other' dimensions. Physical health measures were categorized into physical well-being, functional well-being, and physical symptoms. Average estimated correlations (Fisher z scores) were calculated with generalized estimating equations with robust variance estimation. Overall R/S was associated with overall physical health (z = 0.153, P < .001); this relation was not moderated by sociodemographic or clinical variables. Affective R/S was associated with physical well-being (z = 0.167, P < .001), functional well-being (z = 0.343, P < .001), and physical symptoms (z = 0.282, P < .001). Cognitive R/S was associated with physical well-being (z = 0.079, P < .05) and functional well-being (z = 0.090, P < .01). 'Other' R/S was associated with functional well-being (z = 0.100, P < .05). In conclusion, the results of the current meta-analysis suggest that greater R/S is associated with better patient-reported physical health. These results underscore the importance of attending to patients' religious and spiritual needs as part of comprehensive cancer care.

Indexed as

Health StatusOutcome Assessment, Health CareReligion and MedicineSpiritualityAdaptation, PsychologicalBehaviorCognitionHumansNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSpiritual TherapiesTreatment Outcomecancermeta-analysisquality of lifereligionspirituality

Identifiers

PMID26258868
PMCPMC4618080
OpenAlexW2142895878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.