Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26258412›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2015

Tumor neoantigens: building a framework for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Matthew M Gubin, Maxim N Artyomov, Elaine R Mardis, Robert D Schreiber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 376 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
376citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
23.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

376 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 627 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Overcoming Drug Resistance by Paclitaxel Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular origin, discovery, validation and application of neoantigens.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

316 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew M Gubin
Maxim N Artyomov
Elaine R Mardis
Robert D Schreiber
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Large Scale Genome SequencingU54HG003079 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DUTCHER, SUSAN K · 2004 to 2016
$445.7M
Translational Insights into Estrogen Receptor alpha-Positive Luminal Breast CanceU01CA141541 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CARDIFF, ROBERT D, SCHREIBER, ROBERT DAVID · 2009 to 2013
$3.8M
THE ROLE OF THE INTERFERONS IN CANCER IMMUNOEDITINGR01CA043059 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHREIBER, ROBERT DAVID · 1986 to 2014
$3.8M
DEVELOPMENT OF GENOMICS BASED PERSONALIZED CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPYR01CA190700 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHREIBER, ROBERT DAVID · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA043059NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190700NCI NIH HHS U01 CA141541NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG003079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well established that the immune system can recognize developing cancers and that therapeutic manipulation of immunity can induce tumor regression. The capacity to manifest remarkably durable responses in some patients has been ascribed in part to T cells that can (a) kill tumor cells directly, (b) orchestrate diverse antitumor immune responses, (c) manifest long-lasting memory, and (d) display remarkable specificity for tumor-derived proteins. This specificity stems from fundamental differences between cancer cells and their normal counterparts in that the former develop protein-altering mutations and undergo epigenetic and genetic alterations, resulting in aberrant protein expression. These events can result in formation of tumor antigens. The identification of mutated and aberrantly expressed self-tumor antigens has historically been time consuming and laborious. While mutant antigens are usually expressed in a tumor-specific manner, aberrantly expressed antigens are often shared between cancers and, therefore, in the past, have been the major focus of therapeutic cancer vaccines. However, advances in next-generation sequencing and epitope prediction now permit the rapid identification of mutant tumor neoantigens. This review focuses on a discussion of mutant tumor neoantigens and their use in personalizing cancer immunotherapies.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingImmunity, CellularNeoplasmsEpigenesis, GeneticEpitopesHumansImmunotherapyMutationPrecision MedicineT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID26258412
PMCPMC4588307
OpenAlexW1607316259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.