Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26258394›Full record

ArticleMolecular carcinogenesis2016

No association between mitochondrial DNA copy number and colorectal adenomas.

Bharat Thyagarajan, Weihua Guan, Veronika Fedirko, Helene Barcelo, Huakang Tu, Myron Gross, Michael Goodman, Roberd M Bostick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular carcinogenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mitochondrial DNA variants in colorectal carcinogenesis: Drivers or passengers?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bharat ThyagarajanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Pathology, Medical School University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Weihua GuanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Veronika FedirkoDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Helene BarceloDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Pathology, Medical School University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Huakang TuDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Myron GrossDepartment of Laboratory Medicine Pathology, Medical School University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Michael GoodmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Roberd M BostickDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Mitochondria as a novel biomarker of colorectal adenomaR03CA167701 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THYAGARAJAN, BHARAT · 2012 to 2013
$147k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA167701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite previously reported associations between peripheral blood mtDNA copy number and colorectal cancer, it remains unclear whether altered mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood is a risk factor for colorectal cancer or a biomarker for undiagnosed colorectal cancer. Though colorectal adenomas are well-recognized precursor lesions to colorectal cancer, no study has evaluated an association between mtDNA copy number and colorectal adenoma risk. Hence, we investigated an association between peripheral blood mtDNA copy number and incident, sporadic colorectal adenoma in 412 colorectal adenoma cases and 526 cancer-free controls pooled from three colonoscopy-based case-control studies that used identical methods for case ascertainment, risk factor determination, and biospecimen collection. We also evaluated associations between relative mtDNA copy number and markers of oxidative stress, including circulating F2 -isoprostanes, carotenoids, and fluorescent oxidation products. We measured mtDNA copy number using a quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We used unconditional logistic regression to analyze the association between mtDNA copy number and colorectal adenoma risk after multivariable adjustment. We found no association between logarithmically transformed relative mtDNA copy number, analyzed as a continuous variable, and colorectal adenoma risk (odds ratio = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.82-1.27; P = 0.86). There were no statistically significant associations between relative mtDNA copy number and other markers of oxidative stress. Our findings, taken together with those from previous studies, suggest that relative mtDNA copy number in peripheral blood may more likely be a marker of early colorectal cancer than of risk for the disease or of in vivo oxidative stress. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsAdenomaAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, MitochondrialFemaleGenetic Association StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioOxidative StressReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, Mitochondrialcolorectal adenomamitochondrial DNAoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID26258394
PMCPMC5535736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.