NICE Opioids in Palliative Care (Clinical Guideline 140) - A Guideline Summary.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Stringent Control of Opioids: Sound Public Health Measures, but a Step Too Far in Palliative Care?Current oncology reports · 2020
   Review
2. Incidence of opioid-induced constipation in Japanese patients with cancer pain: A prospective observational cohort study.Cancer medicine · 2019
   Observational
3. Pain management in patients with malignant mesothelioma: challenges and solutions.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019
   Review
4. Mapping French people and health professionals' positions regarding the circumstances of morphine use to relieve cancer pain.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
   Article
5. Reversal of Opioid-Induced Toxicity.Indian journal of palliative care
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as