Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257828›Full record

ArticleColorectal cancer

Relationship of colorectal cancer awareness and knowledge with colorectal cancer screening.

Heather M Brandt, Heather R Dolinger, Patricia A Sharpe, James W Hardin, Franklin G Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Colorectal cancer. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Leveraging Patient Education to Amplify Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States: Strategies and Implications.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Beliefs Underlying Colorectal Cancer Information Seeking Among Young Black Adults: a Reasoned Action Approach Elicitation Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reducing disparities and achieving health equity in colorectal cancer screening.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Heather M BrandtArnold School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior & Cancer Prevention & Control Program, 915 Greene Street, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Heather R DolingerArnold School of Public Health, Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Patricia A SharpeArnold School of Public Health, Prevention Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
James W HardinArnold School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Institute for Families in Society, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Franklin G BergerDepartment of Biological Sciences & Center for Colon Cancer Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Funding

TISSUE BIOREPOSITORYP20RR017698 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FAYAD, RAJA · 2002 to 2011
$22.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim was to describe the association of awareness and knowledge with participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. MATERIALS &

methodsTelephone survey research was conducted with South Carolina (USA) residents aged 50-75 years using a 144-item instrument. Data were analyzed with SAS and Stata. Adjusted odds ratios are reported.

resultsRespondents (n = 1302) had heard of CRC screening (96%) and exhibited high levels of CRC awareness and knowledge; only 74% had ever been screened. Higher levels of knowledge were associated with a greater likelihood of having ever been screened (odds ratio: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.41; p < 0.001).

conclusionResults showed high levels of awareness and knowledge, but modest participation in CRC. Transforming awareness and knowledge into CRC screening participation should be a priority.

Identifiers

PMID26257828
PMCPMC4529290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.