ReviewFrontiers in plant science2015
Genetic control of inflorescence architecture in legumes.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed.
- A genome-wide association analysis identifies a key candidate gene controlling plant growth habit in chickpea.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Isolation and expression of terminal flower1 (TFL1) gene in clove (Syzygium aromaticum L.).BMC research notes · 2025Article
- A model for soybean inflorescence architecture based on morphological and gene expression analysis.Planta · 2025Article
- Comprehensive identification of the PEBP gene family in Vicia faba highlighting VfTFL1a variation and phenotypic insights into determinate growth.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Jan Sjödin faba bean mutant collection: morphological and molecular characterization.Hereditas · 2024Article
- The RPT2a-MET1 axis regulates TERMINAL FLOWER1 to control inflorescence meristem indeterminacy in Arabidopsis.The Plant cell · 2024Article
- Gene-editedFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Modeling the Flowering Activation Motif during Vernalization in Legumes: A Case Study ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Two modes of gene regulation by TFL1 mediate its dual function in flowering time and shoot determinacy of Arabidopsis.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2023Article
- Fine mapping of BnDM1-the gene regulating indeterminate inflorescence in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023Article
- Characterization ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Diversity of woodland strawberry inflorescences arises from heterochrony regulated by TERMINAL FLOWER 1 and FLOWERING LOCUS T.The Plant cell · 2023Article
- The developmental dynamics in cool season legumes with focus on chickpea.Plant molecular biology · 2023Review
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Flowering Time Genes in Cultivated Chickpea and WildInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Review
- Decoding Gene Expression Signatures Underlying Vegetative to Inflorescence Meristem Transition in the Common Bean.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Tracing the Evolution of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Natural variation of Dt2 determines branching in soybean.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of Vernalization-Induced Flowering in Legumes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The architecture of the inflorescence, the shoot system that bears the flowers, is a main component of the huge diversity of forms found in flowering plants. Inflorescence architecture has also a strong impact on the production of fruits and seeds, and on crop management, two highly relevant agronomical traits. Elucidating the genetic networks that control inflorescence development, and how they vary between different species, is essential to understanding the evolution of plant form and to being able to breed key architectural traits in crop species. Inflorescence architecture depends on the identity and activity of the meristems in the inflorescence apex, which determines when flowers are formed, how many are produced and their relative position in the inflorescence axis. Arabidopsis thaliana, where the genetic control of inflorescence development is best known, has a simple inflorescence, where the primary inflorescence meristem directly produces the flowers, which are thus borne in the main inflorescence axis. In contrast, legumes represent a more complex inflorescence type, the compound inflorescence, where flowers are not directly borne in the main inflorescence axis but, instead, they are formed by secondary or higher order inflorescence meristems. Studies in model legumes such as pea (Pisum sativum) or Medicago truncatula have led to a rather good knowledge of the genetic control of the development of the legume compound inflorescence. In addition, the increasing availability of genetic and genomic tools for legumes is allowing to rapidly extending this knowledge to other grain legume crops. This review aims to describe the current knowledge of the genetic network controlling inflorescence development in legumes. It also discusses how the combination of this knowledge with the use of emerging genomic tools and resources may allow rapid advances in the breeding of grain legume crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.