Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Massive sequencing of Ulmus minor's transcriptome provides new molecular tools for a genus under the constant threat of Dutch elm disease.

Pedro Perdiguero, Martin Venturas, María Teresa Cervera, Luis Gil, Carmen Collada

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative Analysis of Transcriptomes ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Priming of Plant Defenses againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro PerdigueroGrupo de Investigación en Genética, Fisiología e Historia Forestal, Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain ; Unidad Mixta de Genómica y Ecofisiología Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Martin VenturasGrupo de Investigación en Genética, Fisiología e Historia Forestal, Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
María Teresa CerveraUnidad Mixta de Genómica y Ecofisiología Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain ; Departamento de Ecología y Genética, Centro de Investigación Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria Madrid, Spain.
Luis GilGrupo de Investigación en Genética, Fisiología e Historia Forestal, Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain ; Unidad Mixta de Genómica y Ecofisiología Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Carmen ColladaGrupo de Investigación en Genética, Fisiología e Historia Forestal, Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain ; Unidad Mixta de Genómica y Ecofisiología Forestal, Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria/Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elms, especially Ulmus minor and U. americana, are carrying out a hard battle against Dutch elm disease (DED). This vascular wilt disease, caused by Ophiostoma ulmi and O. novo-ulmi, appeared in the twentieth century and killed millions of elms across North America and Europe. Elm breeding and conservation programmes have identified a reduced number of DED tolerant genotypes. In this study, three U. minor genotypes with contrasted levels of tolerance to DED were exposed to several biotic and abiotic stresses in order to (i) obtain a de novo assembled transcriptome of U. minor using 454 pyrosequencing, (ii) perform a functional annotation of the assembled transcriptome, (iii) identify genes potentially involved in the molecular response to environmental stress, and (iv) develop gene-based markers to support breeding programmes. A total of 58,429 putative unigenes were identified after assembly and filtering of the transcriptome. 32,152 of these unigenes showed homology with proteins identified in the genome from the most common plant model species. Well-known family proteins and transcription factors involved in abiotic, biotic or both stresses were identified after functional annotation. A total of 30,693 polymorphisms were identified in 7,125 isotigs, a large number of them corresponding to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs; 27,359). In a subset randomly selected for validation, 87% of the SNPs were confirmed. The material generated may be valuable for future Ulmus gene expression, population genomics and association genetics studies, especially taking into account the scarce molecular information available for this genus and the great impact that DED has on elm populations.

Indexed as

Dutch elm diseasenext-generation sequencingSNPstranscriptomeUlmus

Identifiers

PMID26257751
PMCPMC4507047
OpenAlexW1527412990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.