Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257699›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Abnormal emotion processing, but intact fairness and intentionality considerations during social decision-making in schizophrenia.

Javier de la Asuncion, Lise Docx, Bernard Sabbe, Manuel Morrens, Ellen R A de Bruijn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Javier de la AsuncionCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium.
Lise DocxCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium ; Psychiatric Center Brothers Alexians Boechout, Belgium.
Bernard SabbeCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium ; University Psychiatric Center St. Norbertushuis, Duffel Belgium.
Manuel MorrensCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium ; Psychiatric Center Brothers Alexians Boechout, Belgium.
Ellen R A de BruijnCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp Antwerp, Belgium ; Department of Clinical Psychology, Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
University of Antwerp · BELeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder that is highly characterized by social cognitive impairments. Most studies investigating these impairments focus on one specific social domain such as emotion recognition. However, in daily life, processing complex social situations relies on the combination of several social cognitive and affective processes simultaneously rather than one process alone. A modified version of the economically based Ultimatum Game was used to measure the interplay between fairness, intentionality, and emotion considerations during social decision-making. In this task, participants accept or reject fair and unfair monetary offers proposed intentionally or unintentionally by either angry, happy, neutral, or sad proposers. Behavioral data was collected from a group of schizophrenia patients (N = 35) and a group of healthy individuals (N = 30). Like healthy participants, schizophrenia patients differentiated between fair and unfair offers by rejecting unfair offers more compared to fair offers. However, overall patients did reject more fair offers, indicating that their construct of fairness operates within different margins. In both groups, intentional unfair offers were rejected more compared to unintentional ones, indicating a normal integration of intentionality considerations in schizophrenia. Importantly, healthy subjects also differentiated between proposers' emotion when rejecting unfair offers (more rejections from proposers depicting angry faces compared to proposers depicting, happy, neutral, or sad faces). Schizophrenia patients' decision behavior on the other hand, was not affected by the proposers' emotions. The current study thus shows that schizophrenia patients have specific problems with processing and integrating emotional information. Importantly, the finding that patients display normal fairness and intentionality considerations emphasizes preservation of central social cognitive processes in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

emotion processingemotionsfairnessintentionalityschizophreniasocial decision-makingUltimatum Game

Identifiers

PMID26257699
PMCPMC4512029
OpenAlexW1518037397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.