Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257682›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Lagged and instantaneous dynamical influences related to brain structural connectivity.

Carmen Alonso-Montes, Ibai Diez, Lakhdar Remaki, Iñaki Escudero, Beatriz Mateos, Yves Rosseel, Daniele Marinazzo, Sebastiano Stramaglia, Jesus M Cortes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metastable Resting State Brain Dynamics.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carmen Alonso-MontesBasque Center for Applied Mathematics Bilbao, Spain.
Ibai DiezBiocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo, Spain.
Lakhdar RemakiBasque Center for Applied Mathematics Bilbao, Spain.
Iñaki EscuderoBiocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo, Spain ; Radiology Service, Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo, Spain.
Beatriz MateosBiocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo, Spain ; Radiology Service, Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo, Spain.
Yves RosseelDepartment of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Daniele MarinazzoDepartment of Data Analysis, Faculty of Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Sebastiano StramagliaBasque Center for Applied Mathematics Bilbao, Spain ; Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá degli Studi di Bari and INFN Bari, Italy.
Jesus M CortesBiocruces Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo, Spain ; Ikerbasque, The Basque Foundation for Science Bilbao, Spain ; Department of Cell Biology and Histology, University of the Basque Country Leioa, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary neuroimaging methods can shed light on the basis of human neural and cognitive specializations, with important implications for neuroscience and medicine. Indeed, different MRI acquisitions provide different brain networks at the macroscale; whilst diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) provides a structural connectivity (SC) coincident with the bundles of parallel fibers between brain areas, functional MRI (fMRI) accounts for the variations in the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent T2(*) signal, providing functional connectivity (FC). Understanding the precise relation between FC and SC, that is, between brain dynamics and structure, is still a challenge for neuroscience. To investigate this problem, we acquired data at rest and built the corresponding SC (with matrix elements corresponding to the fiber number between brain areas) to be compared with FC connectivity matrices obtained by three different methods: directed dependencies by an exploratory version of structural equation modeling (eSEM), linear correlations (C) and partial correlations (PC). We also considered the possibility of using lagged correlations in time series; in particular, we compared a lagged version of eSEM and Granger causality (GC). Our results were two-fold: firstly, eSEM performance in correlating with SC was comparable to those obtained from C and PC, but eSEM (not C, nor PC) provides information about directionality of the functional interactions. Second, interactions on a time scale much smaller than the sampling time, captured by instantaneous connectivity methods, are much more related to SC than slow directed influences captured by the lagged analysis. Indeed the performance in correlating with SC was much worse for GC and for the lagged version of eSEM. We expect these results to supply further insights to the interplay between SC and functional patterns, an important issue in the study of brain physiology and function.

Indexed as

functional connectivityfunctional magnetic resonance imagingresting statestructural connectivitystructural equation modelingtensor diffusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID26257682
PMCPMC4508482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.