Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257524›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2015

Bridging the gap between education and appropriate use of benzodiazepines in psychiatric clinical practice.

Bernardo Dell'Osso, Umberto Albert, Anna Rita Atti, Claudia Carmassi, Giuseppe Carrà, Fiammetta Cosci, Valeria Del Vecchio, Marco Di Nicola, Silvia Ferrari, Arianna Goracci and 13 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Benzodiazepines for antipsychotic-induced tardive dyskinesia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Alprazolam-related deaths in Scotland, 2004-2020.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Bernardo Dell'OssoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Milan, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy ; Bipolar Disorders Clinic, Stanford Medical School, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Umberto AlbertRita Levi Montalcini Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Anna Rita AttiDepartment of Biomedical and NeuroMotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Claudia CarmassiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe CarràDivision of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Fiammetta CosciDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Valeria Del VecchioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.
Marco Di NicolaInstitute of Psychiatry and Psychology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Silvia FerrariDepartment of Diagnostic-Clinical Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Arianna GoracciDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Clinical Department of Mental Health, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Felice IasevoliDepartment of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Mario LucianoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.
Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging, and Clinical Science, University G.d Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, Italy.
Maria Giulia NanniSection of Psychiatry, Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Alessandra NivoliPsychiatric Institute, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy ; Bipolar Disorder Unit, CIBERSAM, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Federica PinnaDepartment of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Unit of Psychiatry, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Nicola PoloniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Psychiatric Division, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Maurizio PompiliDepartment of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Suicide Prevention Center, Sant' Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gaia SampognaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.
Ilaria TarriconeDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.
Sarah TosatoSection of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Umberto VolpeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.
Andrea FiorilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Naples SUN, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than half a century after their discovery, benzodiazepines (BDZs) still represent one of the largest and most widely prescribed groups of psychotropic compounds, not only in clinical psychiatry but also in the entire medical field. Over the last two decades, however, there has been an increased focus on the development of antidepressants and antipsychotics on the part of the pharmaceutical industry, clinicians, and researchers, with a reduced interest in BDZs, in spite of their widespread clinical use. As a consequence, many psychiatric residents, medical students, nurses, and other mental health professionals might receive poor academic teaching and training regarding these agents, and have the false impression that BDZs represent an outdated chapter in clinical psychopharmacology. However, recent advances in the field, including findings concerning epidemiology, addiction risk, and drug interactions, as well as the introduction of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition with related diagnostic changes, strongly encourage an updated appraisal of the use of BDZs in clinical practice. During a recent thematic event convened with the aim of approaching this topic in a critical manner, a group of young Italian psychiatrists attempted to highlight possible flaws in current teaching pathways, identify the main clinical pros and cons regarding current use of BDZs in clinical practice, and provide an updated overview of their use across specific clinical areas and patient populations. The main results are presented and discussed in this review.

Indexed as

benzodiazepinespsychiatric clinical practicerisks and benefitsteaching issues

Identifiers

PMID26257524
PMCPMC4525786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.