Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257413›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2015

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of flupirtine maleate and ibuprofen in gynaecological ambulatory surgeries: A randomized controlled trial.

Vanita Ahuja, Sukanya Mitra, Sunita Kazal, Anju Huria

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04226443 (The Use of Midazolam and Remifentanil During Arteriovenous Fistula Placement Procedure and Monitored Anesthesia Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04226443 nacompletednot on this map

The Use of Midazolam and Remifentanil During Arteriovenous Fistula Placement Procedure and Monitored Anesthesia Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorKartal Kosuyolu Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research HospitalRan2012 to 2016Enrolled99ConditionsSedative Adverse Reaction, Analgesic Adverse Reaction, Midazolam Adverse Reaction, Adverse Reaction to DrugArmsMidazolam intravenous injection, Remifentanil intravenous bolus dose
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanita AhujaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Sukanya MitraDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Sunita KazalDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Anju HuriaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Government Medical College and Hospital · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFlupirtine maleate is a centrally acting, non-opioid analgesic with unique muscle relaxant properties as compared to common analgesics. The aim of this study was to compare post-operative analgesic efficacy of flupirtine maleate and ibuprofen in patients undergoing gynaecological ambulatory surgeries.

methodsThis prospective, randomised controlled study was conducted in 60 women of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I/II, 18-70 years of age and scheduled to undergo gynaecological ambulatory surgeries. The participants were randomised to receive either 100 mg oral flupirtine maleate (group flupirtine, n = 30) or 800 mg oral ibuprofen (group ibuprofen, n = 30), 1 h prior to surgery and then every 8 h for 48 h. Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS) on movement was assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 h following surgery. Following discharge from hospital, the patients were interviewed telephonically at 12, 24 and 48 h post-operatively. VNRS was statistically analysed using Mann-Whitney test.

resultsVNRS on movement was statistically reduced at 2 h after surgery (P = 0.04) in group flupirtine as compared to group ibuprofen. The analgesic efficacy was similar in both the groups at 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. The satisfaction scores at 24 and 48 h post-operatively were superior in group flupirtine as compared to group ibuprofen (P < 0.001).

conclusionAnalgesic efficacy of flupirtine maleate was comparable with ibuprofen in patients in ambulatory gynaecological patients up to 48 h postoperatively with superior satisfaction scores.

Indexed as

Ambulatory surgical proceduresflupirtineibuprofen

Identifiers

PMID26257413
PMCPMC4523961
OpenAlexW2111380392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.