Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26257388›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016

Gibbs ringing in diffusion MRI.

Jelle Veraart, Els Fieremans, Ileana O Jelescu, Florian Knoll, Dmitry S Novikov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jelle VeraartCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Els FieremansCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Ileana O JelescuCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Florian KnollCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Dmitry S NovikovCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.

Funding

PSYCHOSOCIAL COREP30AG008051 · NIA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI SHAO, YONGZHAO · 1990 to 2019
$36.1M
Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Mesoscopic Biomarkers of Neurodegeneration with Diffusion MRIR01NS088040 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIEREMANS, ELS, NOVIKOV, DMITRY S · 2014 to 2023
$5.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008051NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study and reduce the effect of Gibbs ringing artifact on computed diffusion parameters.

methodsWe reduce the ringing by extrapolating the k-space of each diffusion weighted image beyond the measured part by selecting an adequate regularization term. We evaluate several regularization terms and tune the regularization parameter to find the best compromise between anatomical accuracy of the reconstructed image and suppression of the Gibbs artifact.

resultsWe demonstrate empirically and analytically that the Gibbs artifact, which is typically observed near sharp edges in magnetic resonance images, has a significant impact on the quantification of diffusion model parameters, even for infinitesimal diffusion weighting. We find the second order total generalized variation to be a good choice for the penalty term to regularize the extrapolation of the k-space, as it provides a parsimonious representation of images, a practically full suppression of Gibbs ringing, and the absence of staircasing artifacts typical for total variation methods.

conclusionsRegularized extrapolation of the k-space data significantly reduces truncation artifacts without compromising spatial resolution in comparison to the default option of window filtering. In particular, accuracy of estimating diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters improves so much that unconstrained fits become possible. Magn Reson Med 76:301-314, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

ArtifactsFourier AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedBrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedOscillometryPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificitydiffusion kurtosis imagingdiffusion tensor imagingextrapolationtotal variationtruncation artifact

Identifiers

PMID26257388
PMCPMC4915073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.