ArticleInternational orthopaedics2016
Tantalum rod implantation for femoral head osteonecrosis: survivorship analysis and determination of prognostic factors for total hip arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- What is the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review.International orthopaedics · 2018Pooled it
- Comparative Efficacy of Bone Defect Filler Strategies Following Lesion Debridement for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Review
- Enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic capabilities of adipose-derived stem cells in fish collagen scaffolds for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Techniques of core decompression in the treatment of idiopathic avascular necrosis of the femoral head.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Review
- Bone tissue engineering for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2023Review
- Treatment of non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2022Review
- Porous tantalum implant for treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Comparison of core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation with conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A minimum 18 month follow-up study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Outcome of tantalum rod insertion in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with minimum follow-up of 1 year: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Review
- Modified trapdoor procedures using autogenous tricortical iliac graft without preserving the broken cartilage for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a prospective cohort study with historical controls.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Mid- to long-term results of modified non-vascularized allogeneic fibula grafting combined with core decompression and bone grafting for early femoral head necrosis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Application of biomaterials for the repair and treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.Regenerative biomaterials · 2020Review
- Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- A 3D Printed Porous Titanium Alloy Rod with Diamond Crystal Lattice for Treatment of the Early-Stage Femoral Head Osteonecrosis in Sheep.International journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Review
- Total hip arthroplasty following failure of tantalum rod implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with 5- to 10-year follow-up.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
- Hip osteonecroses treated with calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate bone graft substitute have different results according to the cause of osteonecrosis: alcohol abuse or corticosteroid-induced.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Early failures of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants: a case series with retrieval analysis.International orthopaedics · 2016Article
- 3D printing of Mg-substituted wollastonite reinforcing diopside porous bioceramics with enhanced mechanical and biological performances.Bioactive materials · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the moderate survival data of porous tantalum rod implants for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Additionally, some independent prognostic factors for conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were identified.
methodsThe porous tantalum rod population was obtained from a prospective, consecutive group of patients treated for Steinberg stage I and II osteonecrosis from April 2009 through July 2011. The historical core decompression and impaction of bone filling particle subjects underwent surgery from April 2007 through March 2009. Surgical data including time of surgery, blood loss, and cell transfusions were recorded. Post-operative values were measured for hospitalization length as well as days requiring a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump. Primary outcomes were Harris hip score and survivorship analysis. Demographics and baseline characteristics included age, sex, etiology, bilateral disease, associated chronic systemic disease, Steinberg stage, Harris hip score, accompanied with bone marrow edema of femoral head, and osteonecrotic lesion size.
resultsDemographic/baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. At the post-operative follow-up of 62 months, Harris hip scores were significantly increased (P < 0.0001) when compared to that before surgery in both groups. The magnitude of increase in the tantalum rod implant group was significantly greater than that in the control group (P = 0.0426). With an average follow-up of 48 months (range, 38-62 months), the tantalum rod group had an 84.6 % survival rate. With an average follow-up of 72 months (range, 67-85 months), the control group had a 63.3 % survival rate. A comparison of Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly higher cumulative survival rates (P = 0.048) for hips with implantation of the porous tantalum rod (74.1 % at 62 months) than for those with impaction composite bone material (49.9 % at 62 months). The Cox proportional-hazard model revealed that implantation of tantalum rod (P = 0.012), bone marrow edema (P = 0.003), corticosteroids intake (P = 0.007), and age less than 50 years (P = 0.014) were the independent prognostic factors related to conversion into THA.
conclusionsCompared with the traditional impaction composite bone material technique, implantation of tantalum rod in the treatment of Steinberg stages I and II ONFH can obtain better clinical results and higher cumulative survival rates. For patients without the use of corticosteroids, and especially for hips without bone marrow oedema, the clinical results from our study show highly encouraging survival rates and a delay in or prevention of conversion into THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.