Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26256833›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2015

Degeneration and Regeneration of Subbasal Corneal Nerves after Infectious Keratitis: A Longitudinal In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Study.

Rodrigo T Müller, Farshad Abedi, Andrea Cruzat, Deborah Witkin, Neda Baniasadi, Bernardo M Cavalcanti, Arsia Jamali, James Chodosh, Reza Dana, Deborah Pavan-Langston and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the eye.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Use of white lightIndian journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rodrigo T MüllerOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Farshad AbediOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrea CruzatOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah WitkinOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Neda BaniasadiOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bernardo M CavalcantiOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Arsia JamaliOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
James ChodoshCornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Reza DanaCornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Deborah Pavan-LangstonCornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pedram HamrahOcular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Cornea & Refractive Surgery Service, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Boston Image Reading Center and Cornea Service, New England Eye Center, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: phamrah@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Harvard University · USImaging Center · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

The role of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in corneal immunityR01EY022695 · NEI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI HAMRAH, PEDRAM · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Immunobiology of Corneal Antigen-Presenting CellsK08EY020575 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HAMRAH, PEDRAM · 2010 to 2013
$914k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY020575NEI NIH HHS K08-EY020575NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the longitudinal alterations of subbasal corneal nerves in patients with infectious keratitis (IK) during the acute phase, cessation of treatment, and the recovery phase by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).

designProspective, longitudinal, case-control, single-center study.

participantsFifty-six eyes of 56 patients with the diagnosis of bacterial (n=28), fungal (n=15), or Acanthamoeba (n=13) keratitis were included in the study. Thirty eyes of 30 normal volunteers constituted the control group.

methodsCorneal sensation and serial IVCM of the central cornea were performed prospectively using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3/Rostock Cornea Module (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). The IVCM images were assessed at 3 time points: at the acute phase (first visit to the cornea service), at cessation of antimicrobial treatment, and up to 6 months after the resolution of infection.

main outcome measuresTotal nerve number and length, main nerve trunks, branching, and corneal sensation were assessed during the follow-up period.

resultsCorneal nerves were reduced significantly during the acute phase in eyes with IK compared with controls across all subgroups, with total nerve length of 5.47±0.69 mm/mm2 versus 20.59±1.06 mm/mm2 (P<0.0001). At the cessation of treatment, corneal nerves in patients with IK had regenerated, including total nerve length (8.49±0.94 mm/mm2; P=0.02) and nerve branch length (4.80±0.37 mm/mm2; P=0.005). During the recovery phase, after resolution of infection, corneal nerves regenerated further, including total nerve length (12.13±1.97 mm/mm2; P=0.005), main nerve trunk length (5.80±1.00 mm/mm2; P=0.01), and nerve branch length (6.33±0.76 mm/mm2; P=0.003) as compared with the acute phase, but were still significantly lower when compared with controls (P<0.05 for all parameters). Corneal degeneration and regeneration correlated with corneal sensation (r=0.47; P=0.0009).

conclusionsPatients with IK who sustain profound loss of corneal nerves during the acute phase of infection demonstrate increased corneal nerve density during the first 6 months after the resolution of infection. However, despite significant nerve regeneration, corneal nerve density does not recover fully and remains low compared to controls. By providing an objective methodology to monitor corneal re-innervation, IVCM adds potentially important findings that may have implications for clinical management and surgical planning.

Indexed as

Trigeminal NerveAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntiprotozoal AgentsCase-Control StudiesCorneaCorneal UlcerEye InfectionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedNerve DegenerationNerve RegenerationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID26256833
PMCPMC4623997
OpenAlexW1773858010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.