Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26256789›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2015

Bacterial protein networks: properties and functions.

Athanasios Typas, Victor Sourjik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of chemotaxis in soybean symbiontApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Reservoir Computing-Based Glucose Sensing With an Enzymatic Reaction Network.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A study of the antibacterial mechanism of pinocembrin against multidrug-resistant Aeromonas hydrophila.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Athanasios TypasEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Genome Biology Unit, Meyerhofstr 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
Victor SourjikMax Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology and LOEWE Center for Synthetic Microbiology (SYNMIKRO), Karl-von-Frisch Strasse 16, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distinct cellular functions are executed by separate groups of proteins, organized into complexes or functional modules, which are ultimately interconnected in cell-wide protein networks. Understanding the structures and operational modes of these networks is one of the next great challenges in biology, and microorganisms are at the forefront of research in this field. In this Review, we present our current understanding of bacterial protein networks, their general properties and the tools that are used for systematically mapping and characterizing them. We then discuss two well-studied examples, the chemotaxis network and the cell cycle network in Escherichia coli, to illustrate how network architecture promotes function.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein Interaction MapsBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26256789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.