Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26256538›Full record

ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2015

Cooperative Dynamics of Intact AMPA and NMDA Glutamate Receptors: Similarities and Subfamily-Specific Differences.

Anindita Dutta, James Krieger, Ji Young Lee, Javier Garcia-Nafria, Ingo H Greger, Ivet Bahar

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Tuning synaptic strength by regulation of AMPA glutamate receptor localization.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anindita DuttaDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3064 BST3, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
James KriegerNeurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Ji Young LeeDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3064 BST3, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Javier Garcia-NafriaNeurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Ingo H GregerNeurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK.
Ivet BaharDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3064 BST3, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: bahar@pitt.edu.
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI AYOOB, JOSEPH C · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
NIDA Center of Excellence OF Computational Drug Abuse Research (CDAR)P30DA035778 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Bridging Sequence Patterns and Structural DynamicsR01LM007994 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2004 to 2011
$3.0M
Continued Development of Protein Dynamics Software ProDyR01GM099738 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
Medical Research Council MC_U105174197NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035778NIDA NIH HHS P30DA035778NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099738NLM NIH HHS R01 LM007994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are tetrameric ion channels that mediate excitatory neurotransmission. Recent structures of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionate (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors permit a comparative analysis of whole-receptor dynamics for the first time. Despite substantial differences in the packing of their two-domain extracellular region, the two iGluRs share similar dynamics, elucidated by elastic network models. Motions accessible to either structure enable conformational interconversion, such as compression of the AMPA receptor toward the more tightly packed NMDA receptor conformation, which has been linked to allosteric regulation. Pivoting motions coupled to concerted rotations of the transmembrane ion channel are prominent between dimers of distal N-terminal domains in the loosely packed AMPA receptor. The occurrence and functional relevance of these motions is verified by cross-linking experiments designed to probe the computationally predicted distance changes. Together with the identification of hotspot residues acting as mediators of allosteric communication, our data provide a glimpse into the dynamic spectrum of iGluRs.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationCrystallography, X-RayHEK293 CellsHumansModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateReceptors, AMPAReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartateallosteric eventsAMPA and NMDA receptorsconformational dynamicscrosslinkingeffector residueselastic network modelsionotropic glutamate receptorsmutagenesisNTD-LBD couplingsignal transduction

Identifiers

PMID26256538
PMCPMC4558295
OpenAlexW2103693942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.